Hi,
On 7/10/2018 5:39 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mahesh,
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 15:01:38 EEST Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
On 7/10/2018 4:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mahesh,
On Monday, 2 July 2018 14:07:21 EEST Mahesh Kumar wrote:
This patch introduce a callback function "get_crc_sources" which
will be called during read of control node. It is an optional
callback function and if driver implements this callback, driver
should print list of available CRC sources in seq_file privided
as an input to the callback.
The commit message seems to be outdated, the callback doesn't take a
seq_file anymore.
ops, will update.
Changes Since V1: (Daniel)
- return const pointer to an array of crc sources list
- do validation of sources in CRC-core
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c index c6a725b79ac6..f4d76528d24c
100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
@@ -67,9 +67,27 @@
static int crc_control_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
struct drm_crtc *crtc = m->private;
+ size_t count;
Count it only used within the if () {} block, you can declare it there.
agree.
+
+ if (crtc->funcs->get_crc_sources) {
+ const char *const *sources = crtc->funcs->get_crc_sources(crtc,
+ &count);
+ size_t values_cnt;
+ int i;
I only takes positive values, it can be an unsigned int.
ok
+
+ if (count <= 0 || !sources)
count is a size_t, it can't be negative.
The .get_crc_sources() documentation doesn't clearly specify whether
sources should always be NULL when count is zero. I advise updating the
documentation, and possibly updating this check accordingly.
ok will update.
+ goto out;
+
+ seq_puts(m, "[");
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
+ if (!crtc->funcs->verify_crc_source(crtc, sources[i],
+ &values_cnt))
I assume that you verify sources one by one here to avoid having to create
a list of sources dynamically in the .get_crc_sources() callback ? If so,
I think the .get_crc_sources() callback should document that.
You should also document that .verify_crc_source() is required when
get_crc_sources() is provided.
ok sure.
+ seq_printf(m, "%s ", sources[i]);
+ seq_puts(m, "] ");
This assumes that source names can't include a space. Isn't that too
restrictive ? Shouldn't a different separator be used ? How about one
source name per line ?
what about comma separated as I'm putting names inside square-brackets?
Additionally, shouldn't the active source be marked ?
active source is again printed by the code in next few lines. output
will be of following format.
[space separated list of valid sources] active_source
I had missed that, my bad.
The proposed format seems a bit hackish to me, in the sense that it forbids
both spaces and brackets in source names. One source per line would fix both
and be easy to parse. We would then need to mark the active source, which
could be done by adding a marker to the corresponding line (maybe a * at the
end of the line ?).
sounds good, will do that.
-Mahesh
+ }
+out:
seq_printf(m, "%s\n", crtc->crc.source);
-
return 0;
}
[snip]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
