On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 10:36:49AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Avoids complaints from gcc about ambiguous else clauses. Is that a new thing? I'm fairly sure I've never seen it do that, > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/topology.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h > index cb0775e1ee4b..4fba5a5b148d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/topology.h > +++ b/include/linux/topology.h > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ > > #define for_each_node_with_cpus(node) \ > for_each_online_node(node) \ > - if (nr_cpus_node(node)) > + for_each_if (nr_cpus_node(node)) Not having gotten any of the other patches, I'm not really sure what this does and such, but improve readability it does not :/ _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
