On VGPU scenario the read/write operation of fence_reg will be trapped
by the GVT-g. And then gvt-g follows the HW spec to write the fence_reg.
So it is unnecessary to read/write fence reg several times. This will help
to reduce the unnecessary trap of fence_reg mmio operation.
V1->V2: Fix one typo error of parameter when calling intel_vgpu_active
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
index d92fe03..9c97976 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
@@ -95,11 +95,15 @@ static void i965_write_fence_reg(struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
if (INTEL_GEN(fence->i915) >= 6) {
/* Use the 64-bit RW to read/write fence reg on SNB+ */
- I915_WRITE64_FW(fence_reg_lo, 0);
- I915_READ64(fence_reg_lo);
-
- I915_WRITE64_FW(fence_reg_lo, val);
- I915_READ64(fence_reg_lo);
+ if (intel_vgpu_active(dev_priv))
+ I915_WRITE64_FW(fence_reg_lo, val);
+ else {
+ I915_WRITE64_FW(fence_reg_lo, 0);
+ I915_READ64(fence_reg_lo);
+
+ I915_WRITE64_FW(fence_reg_lo, val);
+ I915_READ64(fence_reg_lo);
+ }
} else {
/* To w/a incoherency with non-atomic 64-bit register updates,
* we split the 64-bit update into two 32-bit writes. In order
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
