>-----Original Message----- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >Shaikh, Azhar >Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 10:45 AM >To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Fix assert_plane() warning on >bootup with external display > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 5:07 AM >>To: Shaikh, Azhar <azhar.shaikh@xxxxxxxxx> >>Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Navare, Manasi D >><manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> >>Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Fix assert_plane() warning on bootup >>with external display >> >>On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 05:11:05PM -0700, Azhar Shaikh wrote: >>> On KBL, WHL RVPs, booting up with an external display connected, >>> triggers below warning, when the BiOS brings up the external display too. >>> This warning is not seen during hotplug. >>> >>> [ 3.615226] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> [ 3.619829] plane 1A assertion failure (expected on, current off) >>> [ 3.632039] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 354 at >>drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1294 assert_plane+0x71/0xbb >>> [ 3.633920] iwlwifi 0000:00:14.3: loaded firmware version 38.c0e03d94.0 >>op_mode iwlmvm >>> [ 3.647157] Modules linked in: iwlwifi cfg80211 btusb btrtl btbcm btintel >>bluetooth ecdh_generic >>> [ 3.647163] CPU: 2 PID: 354 Comm: frecon Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-50176- >>g655af12d39c2 #3 >>> [ 3.647165] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client >>Platform/WhiskeyLake U DDR4 ERB, BIOS >>CNLSFWR1.R00.X140.B00.1804040304 04/04/2018 >>> [ 3.684509] RIP: 0010:assert_plane+0x71/0xbb >>> [ 3.764451] Call Trace: >>> [ 3.766888] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0xa97/0xb77 >>> [ 3.771569] intel_atomic_commit+0x26a/0x279 >>> [ 3.771572] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x5c/0x76 >>> [ 3.780670] __drm_mode_set_config_internal+0x66/0x109 >>> [ 3.780672] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x4c9/0x5cc >>> [ 3.780674] ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x162/0x162 >>> [ 3.789774] ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x162/0x162 >>> [ 3.798108] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x8d/0xe4 >>> [ 3.801926] drm_ioctl+0x27d/0x368 >>> [ 3.805311] ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x162/0x162 >>> [ 3.805314] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x14e/0x199 >>> [ 3.805317] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x2f >>> [ 3.813812] do_vfs_ioctl+0x491/0x4b4 >>> [ 3.813813] ? security_file_ioctl+0x37/0x4b >>> [ 3.813816] ksys_ioctl+0x55/0x75 >>> [ 3.820672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x1e >>> [ 3.820674] do_syscall_64+0x51/0x5f >>> [ 3.820678] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 >>> [ 3.828221] RIP: 0033:0x7b5e04953967 >>> [ 3.835504] RSP: 002b:00007fff2eafb6f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: >>0000000000000010 >>> [ 3.835505] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: >>00007b5e04953967 >>> [ 3.835505] RDX: 00007fff2eafb730 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: >>000000000000000f >>> [ 3.835506] RBP: 00007fff2eafb720 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: >>0000000000000000 >>> [ 3.835507] R10: 0000000000000070 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: >>000000000000000f >>> [ 3.879988] R13: 000056bc9dd7d210 R14: 00007fff2eafb730 R15: >>00000000c06864a2 >>> [ 3.887081] Code: 48 c7 c7 06 71 a5 be 84 c0 48 c7 c2 06 fd a3 be 48 89 f9 48 >0f >>44 ca 84 db 48 0f 45 d7 48 c7 c7 df d3 a4 be 31 c0 e8 af a0 c0 ff <0f> >>0b eb 2b 48 >>c7 c7 06 fd a3 be 84 c0 48 c7 c2 06 71 a5 be 48 >>> [ 3.905845] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 354 at >>drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1294 assert_plane+0x71/0xbb >>> [ 3.920964] ---[ end trace dac692f4ac46391a ]--- >>> >>> The warning is seen when mode_setcrtc() is called for pipeB during >>> bootup and before we get a mode_setcrtc() for pipeA, while doing >>> update_crtcs() in intel_atomic_commit_tail(). >>> Now since, plane1A is still active after commit, update_crtcs() is >>> done for pipeA and eventually update_plane() for plane1A. >>> >>> intel_plane_state->ctl for plane1A is not updated since >>> set_modecrtc() is called for pipeB. So intel_plane_state->ctl for plane 1A >will be 0x0. >>> So doing an update_plane() for plane1A, will result in clearing >>> PLANE_CTL_ENABLE bit, and hence the warning. >>> >>> To fix this warning, force all active planes to recompute their >>> states in probe. >>> >>> Changes in v5: >>> - Drop drm_modeset_lock_all_ctx() since locks will be taken later. >>> >>> Changes in v4: >>> - Handle locking in intel_initial_commit() >>> - Move the for loop inside intel_initial_commit() so that >>> drm_atomic_commit() is called only once >>> - Call intel_initial_commit() only for more than one active crtc on boot. >>> - Save the return value of intel_initial_commit() and print a message in >>> case of an error >>> >>> Changes in v3: >>> - Add comments >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Force all planes to recompute their states.(Ville Syrjälä) >>> - Update the commit message >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Azhar Shaikh <azhar.shaikh@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 71 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>> index 3709fa1b6318..866ebbac30e9 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>> @@ -15092,12 +15092,66 @@ static void >>> intel_update_fdi_pll_freq(struct >>drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >>> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("FDI PLL freq=%d\n", dev_priv->fdi_pll_freq); >>} >>> >>> +static int intel_initial_commit(struct drm_device *dev) { >>> + struct drm_atomic_state *state = NULL; >>> + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx; >>> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state; >>> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc; >> >>Just 'crtc' >> >>> + int ret = 0; >>> + >>> + state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev); >>> + if (!state) >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> + drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, 0); >>> + >>> +retry: >>> + state->acquire_ctx = &ctx; >>> + >>> + for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) { >>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &intel_crtc->base; >> >>Please don't add aliasing pointers for the same thing. It's much easier >>to figure out what's what when you don't have N names for the same thing >essentially. >>I've been trying to slowly elimninate this kind of mess all over. >> >>Since you don't have any use for intel_ types in this function I'd just >>go with >>drm_for_each_crtc() here. > >Ok, will use that and get rid of all intel_types. > >> >>> + >>> + crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc); >>> + if (IS_ERR(crtc_state)) { >>> + ret = PTR_ERR(crtc_state); >>> + goto out; >>> + } >>> + >>> + if (crtc_state->active) { >>> + ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); >>> + if (ret) >>> + goto out; >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> + ret = drm_atomic_commit(state); >>> + if (ret == -EDEADLK) { >>> + drm_atomic_state_clear(state); >>> + drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx); >>> + goto retry; >>> + } >>> + >>> +out: >> >>The label should be before the EDEADLK handling. > >Oh yes! Just checked get_crtc_state() or add_affected_planes() can return >EDEADLK. >Will move it before the EDEADLK handling. > >> >>> + if (state) { >> >>'state' will never be NULL. >> >>> + drm_atomic_state_put(state); >>> + state = NULL; >> >>Pointless assignment. > >Ok, will call only drm_atomic_state_put() unconditionally. >> >>> + } >>> + >>> + drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx); >>> + drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx); >>> + >>> + return ret; >>> +} >>> + >>> int intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev) { >>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); >>> struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt; >>> enum pipe pipe; >>> struct intel_crtc *crtc; >>> + u16 num_active_crtcs; >>> + int ret; >>> >>> dev_priv->modeset_wq = >>alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915_modeset", 0); >>> >>> @@ -15172,8 +15226,6 @@ int intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device >*dev) >>> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->num_pipes > 1 ? "s" : ""); >>> >>> for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) { >>> - int ret; >>> - >>> ret = intel_crtc_init(dev_priv, pipe); >>> if (ret) { >>> drm_mode_config_cleanup(dev); >>> @@ -15203,6 +15255,8 @@ int intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device >>> *dev) >>> >>> if (!crtc->active) >>> continue; >>> + else >>> + num_active_crtcs++; >> >>This seems like needless complexity. There's no harm in doing this >>thing unconditionally. >> > >This was to avoid increase in boot time by 20-30msecs when there is only one >crtc active during probe. Which is the case most of the time. > > >>> >>> /* >>> * Note that reserving the BIOS fb up front prevents us @@ - >>15222,6 >>> +15276,19 @@ int intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev) >>> } >>> >>> /* >>> + * Only in case of more than one active crtc in probe, force >>> + * all active planes to recompute their states. So that on >>> + * mode_setcrtc after probe, all the intel_plane_state variables >>> + * are already calculated and there is no assert_plane warnings >>> + * during bootup. >>> + */ >>> + if (num_active_crtcs > 1) { >>> + ret = intel_initial_commit(dev); >>> + if (ret) >>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Initial commit in probe >>failed.\n"); >>> + } >>> + >>> + /* >>> * Make sure hardware watermarks really match the state we read >>out. >>> * Note that we need to do this after reconstructing the BIOS fb's >>> * since the watermark calculation done here will use pstate->fb. >>> -- >>> 1.9.1 >> >>-- >>Ville Syrjälä >>Intel >_______________________________________________ >Intel-gfx mailing list >Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx