Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-06-29 15:54:02)
>
> On 29/06/2018 08:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > In the next patch, we will want to be able to use more flexible request
> > timelines that can hop between engines. From the vma pov, we can then
> > not rely on the binding of this request to an engine and so can not
> > ensure that different requests are ordered through a per-engine
> > timeline, and so we must track activity of all timelines. (We track
> > activity on the vma itself to prevent unbinding from HW before the HW
> > has finished accessing it.)
> >
> > For now, let's just ignore the potential issue with trying to use 64b
> > indices with radixtrees on 32b machines, it's unlikely to be a problem
> > in practice...
> > +static struct i915_gem_active *lookup_active(struct i915_vma *vma, u64 idx)
> > +{
> > + struct i915_vma_active *active;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * XXX Note that the radix_tree uses unsigned longs for it indices,
> > + * a problem for us on i386 with 32bit longs. However, the likelihood
> > + * of 2 timelines being used on the same VMA aliasing is minimal,
> > + * and further reduced by that both timelines must be active
> > + * simultaneously to confuse us.
> > + */
> > + active = radix_tree_lookup(&vma->active_rt, idx);
> > + if (likely(active)) {
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_active_isset(&active->base) &&
> > + idx != i915_gem_active_peek(&active->base,
> > + &vma->vm->i915->drm.struct_mutex)->fence.context);
> > + return &active->base;
> > + }
> > +
> > + active = kmalloc(sizeof(*active), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (unlikely(!active))
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + init_request_active(&active->base, i915_vma_retire);
> > + active->vma = vma;
> > +
> > + err = radix_tree_insert(&vma->active_rt, idx, active);
> > + if (unlikely(err)) {
> > + kfree(active);
> > + return ERR_PTR(err);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return &active->base;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
> > + struct i915_request *rq,
> > + unsigned int flags)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
> > + struct i915_gem_active *active;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&rq->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
> > +
> > + active = lookup_active(vma, rq->fence.context);
>
> Never mind the radix tree, but fence.context is u64 as well. And
> assigned values are continuously incrementing so once >4G of contexts
> are created and destroyed aliasing is guaranteed with the kernel
> context, or any old one.
As I said, I don't think it matters because you need to alias active
fences and put a GEM_BUG_ON for you to hit. In the next patch, it
becomes ever harder to hit.
The alternative is yet another custom radixtree, and there is nothing
preventing us substituting one radixtree implementation for another here.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
