On 29/06/2018 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
make_obj_busy() makes a dummy busy object, but didn't attach the fence
to the reservation object, so it would not have registered as busy. For
completeness, attach the dummy request as the exclusive fence and mark
the object as written (in i915_vma_move_to_active)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
index 549707b9d738..77dd7a510ea6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -454,7 +454,12 @@ static int make_obj_busy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
return PTR_ERR(rq);
}
- i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, 0);
+ i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
+
+ reservation_object_lock(vma->resv, NULL);
+ reservation_object_add_excl_fence(vma->resv, &rq->fence);
+ reservation_object_unlock(vma->resv);
+
i915_request_add(rq);
i915_gem_object_set_active_reference(obj);
Does it matter or not if the object is marked as written to in this
test? But anyway:
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
