On 29/06/2018 08:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
Currently all callers are responsible for adding the vma to the active
timeline and then exporting its fence. Combine the two operations into
i915_vma_move_to_active() to move all the extra handling from the
callers to the single site.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 47 +++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/huge_pages.c | 4 --
.../drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c | 4 --
.../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 4 --
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index c2dd9b4cdace..91f20445147f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1166,15 +1166,9 @@ static int __reloc_gpu_alloc(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
GEM_BUG_ON(!reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(batch->resv, true));
i915_vma_move_to_active(batch, rq, 0);
- reservation_object_lock(batch->resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(batch->resv, &rq->fence);
- reservation_object_unlock(batch->resv);
Here now the exclusive fence is not added any more due flags being zero.
i915_vma_unpin(batch);
i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
- reservation_object_lock(vma->resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(vma->resv, &rq->fence);
- reservation_object_unlock(vma->resv);
rq->batch = batch;
@@ -1771,25 +1765,6 @@ static int eb_relocate(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
return eb_relocate_slow(eb);
}
-static void eb_export_fence(struct i915_vma *vma,
- struct i915_request *rq,
- unsigned int flags)
-{
- struct reservation_object *resv = vma->resv;
-
- /*
- * Ignore errors from failing to allocate the new fence, we can't
- * handle an error right now. Worst case should be missed
- * synchronisation leading to rendering corruption.
- */
- reservation_object_lock(resv, NULL);
- if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE)
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, &rq->fence);
- else if (reservation_object_reserve_shared(resv) == 0)
- reservation_object_add_shared_fence(resv, &rq->fence);
- reservation_object_unlock(resv);
-}
-
static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
{
const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
@@ -1844,7 +1819,6 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
struct i915_vma *vma = eb->vma[i];
i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags);
- eb_export_fence(vma, eb->request, flags);
__eb_unreserve_vma(vma, flags);
vma->exec_flags = NULL;
@@ -1884,6 +1858,25 @@ static bool i915_gem_check_execbuffer(struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *exec)
return true;
}
+static void export_fence(struct i915_vma *vma,
+ struct i915_request *rq,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct reservation_object *resv = vma->resv;
+
+ /*
+ * Ignore errors from failing to allocate the new fence, we can't
+ * handle an error right now. Worst case should be missed
+ * synchronisation leading to rendering corruption.
+ */
+ reservation_object_lock(resv, NULL);
+ if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE)
+ reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, &rq->fence);
+ else if (reservation_object_reserve_shared(resv) == 0)
+ reservation_object_add_shared_fence(resv, &rq->fence);
+ reservation_object_unlock(resv);
+}
+
void i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
struct i915_request *rq,
unsigned int flags)
@@ -1921,6 +1914,8 @@ void i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE)
i915_gem_active_set(&vma->last_fence, rq);
+
+ export_fence(vma, rq, flags);
}
static int i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets(struct i915_request *rq)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/huge_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/huge_pages.c
index b5e87fcdcdae..358fc81f6c99 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/huge_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/huge_pages.c
@@ -998,10 +998,6 @@ static int gpu_write(struct i915_vma *vma,
i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
- reservation_object_lock(vma->resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(vma->resv, &rq->fence);
- reservation_object_unlock(vma->resv);
-
err_request:
i915_request_add(rq);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
index a4900091ae3d..11427aae0853 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
@@ -225,10 +225,6 @@ static int gpu_set(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
i915_vma_unpin(vma);
- reservation_object_lock(obj->resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(obj->resv, &rq->fence);
- reservation_object_unlock(obj->resv);
-
i915_request_add(rq);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
index 3169b72180d0..a78f8bdb8222 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -179,10 +179,6 @@ static int gpu_fill(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, 0);
i915_vma_unpin(vma);
- reservation_object_lock(obj->resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(obj->resv, &rq->fence);
Here as well this won't be added due zero flags.
- reservation_object_unlock(obj->resv);
-
i915_request_add(rq);
return 0;
There is one i915_vma_move_to_active in render state and one in gvt
which will now have some extra processing/allocations, do we care?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
