> > Right. That's because we've used MISSING_CASE() also in if-ladders in > addition to the switch default case. From our POV the usage is similar. > Yep. > *shrug* > > I guess I like /* fall through */ annotations next to MISSING_CASE() > better than having two different macros depending on where they're being > used. > OK. I'll send a patch for the whole i915 subsystem, shortly. Thanks for the feedback. -- Gustavo _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
