On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:33:29PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2012/11/29 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>: > > Both the dp and fdi code use the exact same computations (ignore minor > > differences in conversion between bits and bytes). > > > > This makes it even more apparent that we have a _massive_ mess between > > cpu transcoder/fdi link/pch transcoder and pch link settings. And also > > that we have hilarious amounts of confusion between edp and dp > > (despite that they're identical at a link level). > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> Slurped in the DP part of this patch-bomb, the watermark stuff isn't really thought through. Thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
