On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:12:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Jani Nikula > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 12 June 2018 at 02:27, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Hi Dave, > >>> > >>> This is the first round targeting 4.19. > >>> > >> Does this tree feed into linux-next already? > >> > >> Since we shouldn't have new stuff for linux-next feeding into it until > >> after rc1. The timing was wrong but the pull is valid now that rc1 is out there. Sorry for the early noise. > > > > I think we'll feed it to linux-next only after merge window closes > > i.e. rc1. > > > >> I won't be pulling this until after rc1 anyways. > > > > Seems fair; this doesn't conflict with tagging manageable sized batches > > in dinq like Rodrigo has done here. So we're good. > > The scripts don't require to send out a pull request when only > tagging, I guess this pull here was just a fumble? not actually. I had tagged that on the week before. It was my mistake on setting my own todo list... instead accounting for the merge window and wait for -rc1 I mistakenly account release date + 1 week when adding the task to my todo list here and end up sending that too early. > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > _______________________________________________ > dim-tools mailing list > dim-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dim-tools _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
