Quoting Piorkowski, Piotr (2018-06-12 14:12:34) > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 21:56 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: series starting with [v2,1/7] drm/i915/guc: Don't store > > runtime GuC log level in modparam (rev3) > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44201/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4280_full -> Patchwork_9205_full = > > > > == Summary - FAILURE == > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9205_full absolutely > > need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the > > changes > > introduced in Patchwork_9205_full, please notify your bug team to > > allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false > > positives in CI. > > > > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4420 > > 1/revisions/3/mbox/ > > > > == Possible new issues == > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_9205_full: > > > > === IGT changes === > > > > ==== Possible regressions ==== > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_hangcheck: > > shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL > > > > > > ==== Warnings ==== > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_guc: > > shard-kbl: PASS -> SKIP +1 > > > > These negative results do not relate to my changes. Applied, but note for the future, your authorname and s-o-b are not an exact match. Please fix so that the scripts don't complain (and let's hope upstream is also forgiving). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
