guc also uses timer-based sampling and cannot reliably hit our accuracy
requirements for the test, so skip.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 4570f926d..61e83bf7b 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1507,6 +1507,17 @@ static void __rearm_spin_batch(igt_spin_t *spin)
#define assert_within(x, ref, tolerance) \
__assert_within(x, ref, tolerance, tolerance)
+static bool uses_timer_sampling(int gem_fd)
+{
+ if (!gem_has_execlists(gem_fd))
+ return true;
+
+ if (gem_has_guc_submission(gem_fd))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void
accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
unsigned long target_busy_pct)
@@ -1524,7 +1535,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
int fd;
/* Sampling platforms cannot reach the high accuracy criteria. */
- igt_require(gem_has_execlists(gem_fd));
+ igt_require(!uses_timer_sampling(gem_fd));
while (idle_us < 2500) {
busy_us *= 2;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
