Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-06-04 15:27:34) > > On 31/05/2018 19:51, Chris Wilson wrote: > > In the next patch, we will process the CSB events directly from the CS > > interrupt handler, being called for each interrupt. Hence, we will no > > Correct to explain it is the user interrupt handler. ? > > longer have the need for a loop until the has-interrupt bit is clear, > > and in the meantime can remove that small optimisation. > > Hm, isn't this assuming the optimistic csb processing from user > interrupt sees the event? If it doesn't, couldn't we still end up > needing the loop here? No. We get the CS interrupt when hw updates the write pointer. (Not sure if it's just the first write.) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx