Quoting Patchwork (2018-05-31 11:04:13) > igt@gem_eio@suspend: > shard-snb: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#105411) +1 I was concerned by this since gem_eio targets the code being changed. In particular, I was concerned that this was bringing back the snb gem_eio nightmare (where we would take out the machine). However, running locally and looking at the previous CI results doesn't show that this is a persistent problem, so I think this failure was a fluke. That isn't to say that there isn't something weird happening on snb, but I don't think it's any weirder than normal. Thank you all for the reviews, let's just hope we don't have to stare at suspend again for a few weeks^W days. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
