Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Only sanitize GEM from late suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 29/05/2018 14:29, Chris Wilson wrote:
During testing we encounter a conflict between SUSPEND_TEST_DEVICES and
disabling reset (gem_eio/suspend). This results in the device continuing
on without being reset, but since it has gone through HW sanitization to

Has some test been failing because of this and since when? gem_eio/suspend?

account for the suspend/resume cycle, we have to assume the device has
been reset to its defaults. A simple way around this is to skip the
sanitize phase for SUSPEND_TEST_DEVICES by moving it to suspend-late.

So suspend_late is not called when suspending via SUSPEND_TEST_DEVICES? Sounds weird to me that core allows a "half-way" suspend mode. But I am not familiar with that code so don't know.

Either way, if we skip it, that only skips the reset which is skipped anyway in gem_eio/suspend so I did not figure out the difference.

Regards,

Tvrtko


Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |  6 +++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 8f002ae22e62..0d9b8cc0436d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -636,6 +636,8 @@ static const struct vga_switcheroo_client_ops i915_switcheroo_ops = {
static void i915_gem_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  {
+	i915_gem_suspend_late(dev_priv);
+
  	/* Flush any outstanding unpin_work. */
  	i915_gem_drain_workqueue(dev_priv);
@@ -1611,7 +1613,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
  	opregion_target_state = suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) ? PCI_D1 : PCI_D3cold;
  	intel_opregion_notify_adapter(dev_priv, opregion_target_state);
- intel_uncore_suspend(dev_priv);
  	intel_opregion_unregister(dev_priv);
intel_fbdev_set_suspend(dev, FBINFO_STATE_SUSPENDED, true);
@@ -1633,7 +1634,10 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend_late(struct drm_device *dev, bool hibernation)
disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv); + i915_gem_suspend_late(dev_priv);
+
  	intel_display_set_init_power(dev_priv, false);
+	intel_uncore_suspend(dev_priv);
/*
  	 * In case of firmware assisted context save/restore don't manually
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 487922f88b76..4257ffc1bae1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3169,6 +3169,7 @@ void i915_gem_cleanup_engines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  			   unsigned int flags);
  int __must_check i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+void i915_gem_suspend_late(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf);
  int i915_gem_object_wait(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 75bdfafc97a2..874ac1a8ec47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -5050,6 +5050,17 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	if (WARN_ON(!intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv)))
  		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+	return 0;
+
+err_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void i915_gem_suspend_late(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
  	/*
  	 * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
  	 * expects the system to be in execlists mode on startup,
@@ -5069,16 +5080,9 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	 * machines is a good idea, we don't - just in case it leaves the
  	 * machine in an unusable condition.
  	 */
-	intel_uc_sanitize(dev_priv);
-	i915_gem_sanitize(dev_priv);
- intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
-	return 0;
-
-err_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
-	return ret;
+	intel_uc_sanitize(i915);
+	i915_gem_sanitize(i915);
  }
void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *i915)

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux