On 22/05/2018 13:46, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-22 13:30:14)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel_lrc.c is the only caller and so to avoid some header file ordering
issues in future patches move these two over there.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Expectation was that we would be using these in guc. Brief highlight of
how the plan changed?
"Let's postpone the disaster" ? :) I am talking about header file
ordering disaster, not GuC, so someone doesn't get me wrong.
But in actuality, since we have postponed GuC until Gen11, and there we
get a different kind of GuC, the kind where will be no way for i915 to
have visibility on when a context get in and out, and which physical
engines. So I think we really won't have a need for these hooks in the
Gen11 GuC code.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
