Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Enable NV12 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 4, 2018 6:46 PM
> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Kristian Høgsberg'
> <hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 'intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  [PATCH v5 0/6] Enable NV12 support
> 
> Op 03-05-18 om 10:58 schreef Srinivas, Vidya:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Srinivas, Vidya
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:47 PM
> >> To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kristian
> >> Høgsberg <hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE:  [PATCH v5 0/6] Enable NV12 support
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 2:29 PM
> >>> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>; Kristian Høgsberg
> >>> <hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: Re:  [PATCH v5 0/6] Enable NV12 support
> >>>
> >>> Hey,
> >>>
> >>> Op 02-05-18 om 04:43 schreef Srinivas, Vidya:
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Kristian Høgsberg [mailto:hoegsberg@xxxxxxxxx]
> >>>>> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 11:58 PM
> >>>>> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> Subject: Re:  [PATCH v5 0/6] Enable NV12 support
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:34 AM Vidya Srinivas
> >>>>> <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Enabling NV12 support:
> >>>>>> - Framebuffer creation
> >>>>>> - Primary and Sprite plane support Patch series depend on Enable
> >>>>>> display workaround 827 patch mentioned below submitted by
> Maarten
> >>>>> How are we looking on being able to land these last NV12 patches?
> >>>> I think Maarten is working on this series related
> >>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42476/
> >>>> I guess all would go in together?
> >>> I did some testing and with just the nv12 series and my series I
> >>> don't hit underruns.
> >> Thank you so much. I applied your series
> >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42476/
> >> And then applied the NV12 series
> >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41674/
> >> Somehow, I see that patch 6 doesn’t show the updated contents you
> >> have submitted under https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/219915/
> >> Not sure if only I don’t see the change (series show updated may 2nd
> >> but rev
> >> 3 contents are not reflecting in patch 6)
> > What I meant to ask was - should I make the changes and update again?
> > Or could you please help push it from your side? Please let me know.
> > Thank you. Also, can all these go in now? I mean for merge :)
> We want to test again on top of drm-tip, so best just make the changes, and
> reorder in the order I specified earlier. :)
> 
Thank you so much. I have changed the patch and ordering as per your suggestion
vnd floated them. Kindly have a check.

Regards
Vidya

> ~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux