Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Micro-optimise i915_request_retire()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/05/2018 15:06, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2018-05-03 14:59:35)
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-02 20:21:42)
I caught the compiler emitting the if(!NULL) guard at the start of
dma_fence_put(); on the request it should know for certain is already
non-NULL. Mark up the function as non-null and tell the compiler that
the request pointer doesn't change:

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-5 (-5)
Function                                     old     new   delta
i915_request_retire                         1782    1777      -5

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Heh, Tvrtko out Joonased Jonas, as he complained that this was doing the
compiler's job: "where does it end?"

Yeah, Joonas is getting soft. ;)

My concern was that we could then go around annotating many function arguments which cannot take NULLs. (Which I think we should not do.) So it seemed random to annotate just one for one branch saved, with potentially just one compiler version/whatever. Just my 2c.

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux