Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2018-04-30 21:51:45)
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:01:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2018-04-30 20:31:19)
> > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:14:51PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > Commit 39bf4de89ff7 ("drm/i915: Add -Wall -Wextra to our build, set
> > > > warnings to full") enabled extra warnings for i915 to spot possible
> > > > bugs in new code, and then disabled a subset of these warnings to keep
> > > > the current code building without warnings (with gcc). Enabling the
> > > > extra warnings also enabled some additional clang-only warnings, as a
> > > > result building i915 with clang currently is extremely noisy. For now
> > > > also disable the clang warnings sign-compare, sometimes-uninitialized,
> > > > unneeded-internal-declaration and initializer-overrides. If desired
> > > > they can be re-enabled after the code has been fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 39bf4de89ff7 ("drm/i915: Add -Wall -Wextra to our build, set
> > > > warnings to full")
> >
> > Do we need to backport this for a non-default build with a non-default
> > compiler?
>
> If it affected a LTS build I'd say yes, but since that isn't the case
> I think it's not necessary.
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - rebased on drm-tip
> > > > - added comment indicating that disabled warnings are clang warnings
> > > >
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> > > > index 4eee91a3a236..9717c037b582 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> > > > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, type-limits)
> > > > subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-field-initializers)
> > > > subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, implicit-fallthrough)
> > > > subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
> > > > +# clang warnings
> > > > +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, sign-compare)
> >
> > Too much mixup in the code to be fixed overnight indeed.
> >
> > > > +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, sometimes-uninitialized)
> >
> > Annoyingly it appears that clang has more false positives.
> >
> > > > +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unneeded-internal-declaration)
> >
> > Example? I don't recall this one, so don't know if we should just not
> > fix it rather than suppress. I've used ignored-attributes, perhaps that
> > was for the same cause.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c:183:13: warning: function
> 'has_doorbell' is not needed and will not be emitted
> [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
> static bool has_doorbell(struct intel_guc_client *client)
>
> The function is only called within a GEM_BUG_ON macro, which does not
> evaluate the expression unless CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM is set.
>
> Instead of disabling the warning it would probably be better to mark
> has_doorbell as __maybe_unused.
Hmm, if it is just this one, I would remove the use from
intel_guc_submission and move it into selftests/
The single use case inside intel_guc_submission isn't that interesting
and I doubt we would miss not having the assert.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
