On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 09:11:31AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 27.04.2018 um 08:17 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > When this was introduced in
> >
> > commit a519435a96597d8cd96123246fea4ae5a6c90b02
> > Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue Oct 20 16:34:16 2015 +0200
> >
> > dma-buf/fence: add fence_wait_any_timeout function v2
> >
> > there was a restriction added that this only works if the dma-fence
> > uses the dma_fence_default_wait hook. Which works for amdgpu, which is
> > the only caller. Well, until you share some buffers with e.g. i915,
> > then you get an -EINVAL.
> >
> > But there's really no reason for this, because all drivers must
> > support callbacks. The special ->wait hook is only as an optimization;
> > if the driver needs to create a worker thread for an active callback,
> > then it can avoid to do that if it knows that there's a process
> > context available already. So ->wait is just an optimization, just
> > using the logic in dma_fence_default_wait() should work for all
> > drivers.
> >
> > Let's remove this restriction.
>
> Mhm, that was intentional introduced because for radeon that is not only an
> optimization, but mandatory for correct operation.
>
> On the other hand radeon isn't using this function, so it should be fine as
> long as the Intel driver can live with it.
Well dma-buf already requires that dma_fence_add_callback works correctly.
And so do various users of it as soon as you engage in a bit of buffer
sharing. I guess whomever cares about buffer sharing with radeon gets to
fix this (you need to spawn a kthread or whatever in ->enable_signaling
which does the same work as your optimized ->wait callback).
But yeah, I'm definitely not making things work with this series, just a
bit more obvious that there's a problem already.
-Daniel
>
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 5 -----
> > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > index 7b5b40d6b70e..59049375bd19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > @@ -503,11 +503,6 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
> > for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
> > struct dma_fence *fence = fences[i];
> > - if (fence->ops->wait != dma_fence_default_wait) {
> > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > - goto fence_rm_cb;
> > - }
> > -
> > cb[i].task = current;
> > if (dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &cb[i].base,
> > dma_fence_default_wait_cb)) {
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
