Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-25 10:30:51) > Related, there could be potential to unify i915_request_retire_upto and > ring_retire_requests. Latter could pass in NULL as the upto request, > just the completed check would need to be different depending on the mode. Also remember that _upto is the public variant, doing the individual request retirement was kept private. As the ordering is paramount, the public version needs to be retire iff first, or retire all/upto. An attempt was made to have one interface that dtrt. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
