The old wait_on_atomic_t used a custom callback to perform the schedule(), which used my return semantics of reporting an error code on timeout. wait_var_event_timeout() uses the schedule() return semantics of reporting the remaining jiffies (1 if it timed out with 0 jiffies remaining!) and 0 on failure. This semantic mismatch lead to us falsely claiming a time out occurred. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106085 Fixes: d224985a5e31 ("sched/wait, drivers/drm: Convert wait_on_atomic_t() usage to the new wait_var_event() API") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_breadcrumbs.c index 46580026c7fc..d6926e7820e5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_breadcrumbs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_breadcrumbs.c @@ -412,10 +412,11 @@ static int igt_wakeup(void *arg) * that they are ready for the next test. We wait until all * threads are complete and waiting for us (i.e. not a seqno). */ - err = wait_var_event_timeout(&done, !atomic_read(&done), 10 * HZ); - if (err) { + if (!wait_var_event_timeout(&done, + !atomic_read(&done), 10 * HZ)) { pr_err("Timed out waiting for %d remaining waiters\n", atomic_read(&done)); + err = -ETIMEDOUT; break; } -- 2.17.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
