Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/i915/cnl: Implement WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/16/2018 3:09 PM, Oscar Mateo wrote:


On 04/16/2018 02:22 PM, Yunwei Zhang wrote:
WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads dictate that before any MMIO
read into Slice/Subslice specific registers, MCR packet control
register(0xFDC) needs to be programmed to point to any enabled
slice/subslice pair. Otherwise, incorrect value will be returned.

However, that means each subsequent MMIO read will be forwarded to a
specific slice/subslice combination as read is unicast. This is OK since
slice/subslice specific register values are consistent in almost all cases across slice/subslice. There are rare occasions such as INSTDONE that this value will be dependent on slice/subslice combo, in such cases, we need to
program 0xFDC and recover this after. This is already covered by
read_subslice_reg.

Also, 0xFDC will lose its information after TDR/engine reset/power state
change.

References: HSD#1405586840, BSID#0575

v2:
  - use fls() instead of find_last_bit() (Chris)
  - added INTEL_SSEU to extract sseu from device info. (Chris)
v3:
  - rebase on latest tip
v5:
  - Added references (Mika)
  - Change the ordered of passing arguments and etc. (Ursulin)
v7:
  - Rebased.

Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yunwei Zhang <yunwei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  2 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c   | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c | 12 ++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 8e8667d..43498a47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2725,6 +2725,8 @@ int vlv_force_gfx_clock(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool on);
  int intel_engines_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  int intel_engines_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  +u32 calculate_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mcr);
+

As a global function, this could use a better prefix (intel_something_)

Or, alternatively, make it local and store the calculation somewhere.
Good suggestion, do you think intel_device_info will be a good place to store, it is deduced from that structure after all? Or should I put it in drm_i915_private?

  /* intel_hotplug.c */
  void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                 u32 pin_mask, u32 long_mask);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index 1a83707..3b6bc5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -799,6 +799,18 @@ const char *i915_cache_level_str(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int type)
      }
  }
  +u32 calculate_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mcr)
+{
+    const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu);
+    u32 slice = fls(sseu->slice_mask);
+    u32 subslice = fls(sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
+
+    mcr &= ~(GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK);
+    mcr |= GEN8_MCR_SLICE(slice) | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
+
+    return mcr;
+}
+
  static inline uint32_t
  read_subslice_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int slice,
            int subslice, i915_reg_t reg)
@@ -831,18 +843,30 @@ read_subslice_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int slice,
      intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
        mcr = I915_READ_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR);
+
      /*
       * The HW expects the slice and sublice selectors to be reset to 0
-     * after reading out the registers.
+     * before GEN10 or to a enabled s/ss post GEN10 after reading out the
+     * registers.
       */
-    WARN_ON_ONCE(mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask);
+    WARN_ON_ONCE(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10 &&
+             (mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask));

Advantage of storing the calculation: you can assert here for the expected value, independently of the platform.

      mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
      mcr |= mcr_slice_subslice_select;
      I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
        ret = I915_READ_FW(reg);
  -    mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
+    /*
+     * WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads:cnl
+     * expects mcr to be programed to a enabled slice/subslice pair
+     * before any MMIO read into slice/subslice register
+     */
+    if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
+        mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
+    else
+        mcr = calculate_mcr(dev_priv, mcr);

Another advantage: no branching here either.

+
      I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
        intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c
index ec9d340..8a2354e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -645,8 +645,20 @@ static void cfl_gt_workarounds_apply(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
             GAMT_ECO_ENABLE_IN_PLACE_DECOMPRESS);
  }
  +static void wa_init_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+    u32 mcr;
+
+    mcr = I915_READ(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR);
+    mcr = calculate_mcr(dev_priv, mcr);
+    I915_WRITE(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
+}
+
  static void cnl_gt_workarounds_apply(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  {
+    /* WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads: cnl */
+    wa_init_mcr(dev_priv);
+
      /* WaDisableI2mCycleOnWRPort:cnl (pre-prod) */
      if (IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_B0, CNL_REVID_B0))
          I915_WRITE(GAMT_CHKN_BIT_REG,

With one of the two above (appropriate prefix or store value), this is:

Reviewed-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>

And as a side note: this is also needed for Icelake.
Will do in a separate patch, when I first floated the patch, icl was still in internal.

Thanks,
Yunwei

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux