Resetting the GPU doesn't affect the RPS/RC6 state, so we can stop
forcibly reloading the registers.
Ville suggested this many moons ago, I said at that time that sanitizing
was no harm and meant that our bookkeeping was kept consistent with the
HW. However, in a forthcoming series, we want to split rps/rc6 GT
powermanagement and one of the key simplifications is the control of
when we enable it. Performing a crude sanitize in the middle of
i915_gem_reset() is then a huge wart.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 28ab0beff86c..60cf7cfc24ee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3254,13 +3254,6 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
-
- if (dev_priv->gt.awake) {
- intel_sanitize_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
- intel_enable_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
- if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
- gen6_rps_busy(dev_priv);
- }
}
void i915_gem_reset_finish_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
