Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-04-09 15:08:40)
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 14:42:19 +0200, Chris Wilson
> <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Our execlists emulation for GuC requires use of the breadcrumb following
> > every request as a simulcrum for the context-switch interrupt, which we
> > then use to drive the submission tasklet. Therefore, when we unpark the
> > engine for use with the GuC, we pin the breadcrumb interrupt to keep it
> > enabled for the duration. This has to be remain so across all resets,
> > wedging and resume, so check we do have the irq enabled when we start
> > submitting requests to the GuC and on all submissions thereafter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index 97121230656c..a7957b669b68 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -758,6 +758,8 @@ static void guc_submission_tasklet(unsigned long
> > data)
> > struct execlist_port *port = execlists->port;
> > struct i915_request *rq;
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(!READ_ONCE(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_enabled));
> > +
> > rq = port_request(port);
> > while (rq && i915_request_completed(rq)) {
> > trace_i915_request_out(rq);
>
> LGTM, but can you run this with GuC enabled ?
Are you afraid? If gem_eio isn't hitting this, I need to tweak gem_eio
;)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
