Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-04-06 23:18:16) > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:12:27AM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 12:49 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = > > > + dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc; > > I'm afraid that the issue is this pointer here. So this will only mask > the issue. > > Should we maybe stash the pipe? :/ It's not that bad. pipe cannot change until after psr_disable is called, right? And psr_disable ensures that this worker is flushed. The current problem is just the coordination of cancelling the worker, where we may set psr.enabled to NULL right before the worker grabs it and dereferences it. So if we lock until we have the pipe, we know that dereference chain is valid, and we know that psr_disable() cannot complete until we complete the wait. So the pipe remains valid until we return (so long as the pipe exists when we start). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
