On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We want to get rid of plane->fb/crtc on atomic drivers. Stop setting > them. > > v2: Fix up the comment in intel_crtc_active() and > nuke the rest of the stale comments (Daniel) > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #v1 > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> lgtm, ack on adding my r-b. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 12 ------------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c > index 7481ce85746b..eb0579fb5e54 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c > @@ -120,12 +120,6 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_ > &crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode; > int ret; > > - /* > - * Both crtc and plane->crtc could be NULL if we're updating a > - * property while the plane is disabled. We don't actually have > - * anything driver-specific we need to test in that case, so > - * just return success. > - */ > if (!intel_state->base.crtc && !old_plane_state->base.crtc) > return 0; > > @@ -204,12 +198,6 @@ static int intel_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane, > const struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state; > struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state; > > - /* > - * Both crtc and plane->crtc could be NULL if we're updating a > - * property while the plane is disabled. We don't actually have > - * anything driver-specific we need to test in that case, so > - * just return success. > - */ > if (!crtc) > return 0; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 415fb8cf2cf4..469792fa098d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ bool intel_crtc_active(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > * We can ditch the adjusted_mode.crtc_clock check as soon > * as Haswell has gained clock readout/fastboot support. > * > - * We can ditch the crtc->primary->fb check as soon as we can > + * We can ditch the crtc->primary->state->fb check as soon as we can > * properly reconstruct framebuffers. > * > * FIXME: The intel_crtc->active here should be switched to > @@ -2877,9 +2877,8 @@ intel_find_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > if (i915_gem_object_is_tiled(obj)) > dev_priv->preserve_bios_swizzle = true; > > - drm_framebuffer_get(fb); > - primary->fb = primary->state->fb = fb; > - primary->crtc = primary->state->crtc = &intel_crtc->base; > + plane_state->fb = fb; > + plane_state->crtc = &intel_crtc->base; > > intel_set_plane_visible(to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state), > to_intel_plane_state(plane_state), > -- > 2.16.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
