Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-03 17:09:09) > > On 03/04/2018 14:10, Chris Wilson wrote: > > To me it seems like the closed system with each loop being "spin then > > adjusted sleep" will autocorrect and more likely to finish correct (as > > we are less reliant on the next loop for the accuracy). It's pretty much > > immaterial, as we expect the pmu to match the measurements (and not our > > expectations), but I find the one pass does all much simpler to follow. > > Since we do a good number of loops, and hope the calibration will > converge quickly (which it does for me), I don't see that there is an > issue there. I'm sitting here drinking coffee trying to decide if it does converge ;) That's the problem here, I need to actually find a pencil, some paper and remember some basic maths for series convergence. Not happening with the amount of coffee I need to drink at the moment. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
