Quoting Francisco Jerez (2018-03-28 19:55:12) > Hi Chris, > [snip] > That said, it wouldn't hurt to call each of them once per sequence of > overlapping requests. Do you want me to call them from > execlists_set/clear_active() themselves when bit == EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER, > or at each callsite of execlists_set/clear_active()? [possibly protected > with a check that execlists_is_active(EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) wasn't > already the expected value] No, I was thinking of adding an execlists_start()/execlists_stop() [naming suggestions welcome, begin/end?] where we could hook additional bookkeeping into. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
