On 3/26/2018 9:57 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 26/03/2018 17:12, Yunwei Zhang wrote:
WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads dictate that before any
MMIO
read into Slice/Subslice specific registers, MCR packet control
register(0xFDC) needs to be programmed to point to any enabled
slice/subslice pair. Otherwise, incorrect value will be returned.
However, that means each subsequent MMIO read will be forwarded to a
specific slice/subslice combination as read is unicast. This is OK since
slice/subslice specific register values are consistent in almost all
cases
across slice/subslice. There are rare occasions such as INSTDONE that
this
value will be dependent on slice/subslice combo, in such cases, we
need to
program 0xFDC and recover this after. This is already covered by
read_subslice_reg.
Also, 0xFDC will lose its information after TDR/engine reset/power state
change.
Reference: HSD#1405586840 BSID#0575
v2:
- use fls() instead of find_last_bit() (Chris)
- added INTEL_SSEU to extract sseu from device info. (Chris)
v3:
- rebase on latest tip
v4:
- Added references (Mika)
Signed-off-by: Yunwei Zhang <yunwei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 39
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 800230b..2db2a04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2297,6 +2297,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
#define INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.gen)
#define INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.device_id)
+#define INTEL_SSEU(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.sseu)
If we add this someone gets the job of converting existing users?
This is suggestion from Chris Wilson, I am new here, but I guess if I am
going to do that, it is better in a separate patch. I will remove this
in next patchset and submit a new patch later.
#define REVID_FOREVER 0xff
#define INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->drm.pdev->revision)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index de09fa4..cc19e0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -796,6 +796,27 @@ const char *i915_cache_level_str(struct
drm_i915_private *i915, int type)
}
}
+static u32 calculate_mcr(u32 mcr, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
dev_priv first would be more typical function argument order.
+{
+ const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &(INTEL_SSEU(dev_priv));
+ u32 slice = fls(sseu->slice_mask);
+ u32 subslice = fls(sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
+
+ mcr &= ~(GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK);
+ mcr |= GEN8_MCR_SLICE(slice) | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
+
+ return mcr;
+}
+
+static void wa_init_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ u32 mcr;
+
+ mcr = I915_READ(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR);
+ mcr = calculate_mcr(mcr, dev_priv);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
+}
+
static inline uint32_t
read_subslice_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int slice,
int subslice, i915_reg_t reg)
@@ -828,18 +849,29 @@ read_subslice_reg(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, int slice,
intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
mcr = I915_READ_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR);
+
/*
* The HW expects the slice and sublice selectors to be reset to 0
* after reading out the registers.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask);
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask);
Can squash to single line WARN_ON_ONCE(INTEL_GEN() < 10 && (mcr &
...)), if it fits.
mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
mcr |= mcr_slice_subslice_select;
I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
ret = I915_READ_FW(reg);
- mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
+ /*
+ * WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads:cnl
+ * expects mcr to be programed to a enabled slice/subslice pair
+ * before any MMIO read into slice/subslice register
+ */
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
+ mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
+ else
+ mcr = calculate_mcr(mcr, dev_priv);
Does it make sense to move the conditional and comment to
calculate_mcr - so here only a single call to it remains?
I am thinking maybe it is better to save jump/return for GENs that don't
have WA..
+
I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
@@ -1307,6 +1339,9 @@ static int cnl_init_workarounds(struct
intel_engine_cs *engine)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
int ret;
+ /* WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads: cnl */
+ wa_init_mcr(dev_priv);
+
/* WaDisableI2mCycleOnWRPort:cnl (pre-prod) */
if (IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_B0, CNL_REVID_B0))
I915_WRITE(GAMT_CHKN_BIT_REG,
Above are suggestions and questions only.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
