On 3/23/2018 8:44 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
In function gem_init_hw() we are calling uc_init_hw() but in case
of error later in function, we missed to call matching uc_fini_hw()
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 802df8e..7fad180 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -5171,9 +5171,15 @@ int i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
/* Only when the HW is re-initialised, can we replay the requests */
ret = __i915_gem_restart_engines(dev_priv);
+ if (ret)
+ goto cleanup_uc;
out:
intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
return ret;
+
+cleanup_uc:
+ intel_uc_fini_hw(dev_priv);
+ goto out;
}
static int __intel_engines_record_defaults(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
--
Thanks,
Sagar
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
