Hello, On Monday, 19 March 2018 18:41:05 EET Ulrich Hecht wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I have run the tests on a Renesas R-Car M3-W's DU device, and have found > >> a number of false negatives that mostly stem from use of Intel-specifics > >> without checking if that makes sense first. So here's a bunch of fixes > >> for those, hope they are generic enough for upstreaming. > > > > Nice, other people using this! Do you plan to maintain this actively going > > forward, or is this more a one-off effort? > > For now, this is just an attempt at evaluating if this works for us. > It has caught a few things that look like legitimate bugs to me, > though... That's good news ! (Not that I'm happy that we have bugs, but catching them shows that igt is useful for us). I hope this will help convincing management that we should keep contributing to igt going forward. Ulrich, for the record, I agree with all of Daniel's and Ville's comments posted so far. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
