Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-03-15 14:37:59) > > On 15/03/2018 13:45, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As we are making changes to igt_spin_t, one of the ideas was that we put > > the obj[] array there (with the offsets and flags setup correctly) so > > that we could just feed that in again later without having to worry > > about the relocations. > > I tried that before but we couldn't agree on resubmit semantics. > > My patch had igt_spin_batch_restart(fd, spin) - so emitting the exact > same batch, including the dependency. That would actually work well for > this use case. > > So if you are happy with that, I can resurrect that patch, add one more > to implement stuff from this patch, and rebase perf_pmu changes to follow. Honestly, best to do here first, as we will probably take forever to come up with something we both like and applies to more test cases. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
