> -----Original Message----- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 2:43 PM > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Syrjala, Ville <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx>; Lankhorst, Maarten > <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 17/17] drm/i915: Display WA 827 > > Op 09-03-18 om 09:49 schreef Vidya Srinivas: > > Display WA 827 applies to GEN9 (excluede GLK) and CNL. > > Switching the plane format from NV12 to RGB and leaving system idle > > results in display underrun and corruption. > > WA: Set the bit 15 & bit 19 to 1b in the CLKGATE_DIS_PSL register for > > the pipe in which NV12 plane is enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 8e61b68..dd8ee98 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -3939,6 +3939,9 @@ enum { > > #define _CLKGATE_DIS_PSL_A 0x46520 > > #define _CLKGATE_DIS_PSL_B 0x46524 > > #define _CLKGATE_DIS_PSL_C 0x46528 > > +#define DUPS1_GATING_DIS (1 << 15) > > +#define DUPS2_GATING_DIS (1 << 19) > > +#define DUPS3_GATING_DIS (1 << 23) > > #define DPF_GATING_DIS (1 << 10) > > #define DPF_RAM_GATING_DIS (1 << 9) > > #define DPFR_GATING_DIS (1 << 8) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index 941f00d..f5fdf8a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -504,6 +504,21 @@ static const struct intel_limit intel_limits_bxt = { > > .p2 = { .p2_slow = 1, .p2_fast = 20 }, }; > > > > +static void > > +skl_wa_clkgate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int pipe, bool > > +enable) { > > + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) > > + return; > > + > > + if (enable) > > + I915_WRITE(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe), > > + DUPS1_GATING_DIS | DUPS2_GATING_DIS); > > + else > > + I915_WRITE(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe), > > + I915_READ(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe)) & > > + ~(DUPS1_GATING_DIS|DUPS2_GATING_DIS)); > > +} > > + > > static bool > > needs_modeset(const struct drm_crtc_state *state) { @@ -3151,6 > > +3166,9 @@ int skl_check_plane_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state > *crtc_state, > > const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->base.fb; > > unsigned int rotation = plane_state->base.rotation; > > int ret; > > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc); > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > > + to_i915(plane_state->base.plane->dev); > > > > if (rotation & DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X && > > fb->modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) { @@ -3175,6 > +3193,13 @@ > > int skl_check_plane_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > ret = skl_check_nv12_aux_surface(plane_state); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > + > > + /* Display WA 827 */ > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 9 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) > { > > + if (!IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) > > + skl_wa_clkgate(dev_priv, > > + intel_crtc->pipe, true); > > + } > > } else if (fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS || > > fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS) { > > ret = skl_check_ccs_aux_surface(plane_state); > This is absolutely the wrong place to put this. atomic check can be called > without any power well enabled, and the only way The right place is > intel_pre_plane_update/intel_post_plane_update. > > We already have a active_planes property, so we would need something > similar for nv12 planes. > > In pre_plane_update, we could enable the w/a if new_crtc_state- > >nv12_planes. > In post_plane_update, we can disable it if !new_crtc_state->nv12_planes. Thank you, I will make this change and float the patch. Regards Vidya _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx