On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> On fi-cnl-y3 we have 2 modes that differ only by crtc_clock. This means
> that if we request the normal mode, we automatically get the downclocked
> mode.
>
> This can be seen during boot:
> [drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes] [CONNECTOR:101:eDP-1] probed modes :
> [drm:drm_mode_debug_printmodeline] Modeline 102:"3840x2160" 60 533250 3840 3888 3920 4000 2160 2163 2168 2222 0x48 0xa
> [drm:drm_mode_debug_printmodeline] Modeline 103:"3840x2160" 48 426600 3840 3888 3920 4000 2160 2163 2168 2222 0x40 0xa
> ...
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] [CRTC:51:pipe A][modeset]
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] output_types: EDP (0x100)
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] cpu_transcoder: EDP, pipe bpp: 24, dithering: 0
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] dp m_n: lanes: 4; gmch_m: 4970250, gmch_n: 8388608, link_m: 828375, link_n: 1048576, tu: 64
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] dp m2_n2: lanes: 4; gmch_m: 4970250, gmch_n: 8388608, link_m: 828375, link_n: 1048576, tu: 64
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] audio: 0, infoframes: 0
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] requested mode:
> [drm:drm_mode_debug_printmodeline] Modeline 0:"3840x2160" 60 533250 3840 3888 3920 4000 2160 2163 2168 2222 0x48 0xa
> [drm:intel_dump_pipe_config [i915]] adjusted mode:
> [drm:drm_mode_debug_printmodeline] Modeline 0:"3840x2160" 48 426600 3840 3888 3920 4000 2160 2163 2168 2222 0x40 0xa
>
> Add a intel_edp_choose_mode helper that picks the mode.
>
> If there is no alt mode, it always picks the default mode.
> If the alt mode is identical to the default mode, it picks the mode
> based on what mode is closest to the request clock.
> If the alt mode differs, it only picks the alt mode on exact match.
>
> Testcase: kms_panel_fitting.atomic-fastset
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: dc911f5bd8aa ("drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available.")
> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.14+
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105469
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105456
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 9a4a51e79fa1..075981842a7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1671,21 +1671,25 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> return bpp;
> }
>
> -static bool intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(struct drm_display_mode *m1,
> - struct drm_display_mode *m2)
> +static const struct drm_display_mode *
> +intel_edp_choose_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *req,
> + const struct drm_display_mode *def,
> + const struct drm_display_mode *alt)
> {
> - bool bres = false;
> + if (!alt)
> + return def;
>
> - if (m1 && m2)
> - bres = (m1->hdisplay == m2->hdisplay &&
> - m1->hsync_start == m2->hsync_start &&
> - m1->hsync_end == m2->hsync_end &&
> - m1->htotal == m2->htotal &&
> - m1->vdisplay == m2->vdisplay &&
> - m1->vsync_start == m2->vsync_start &&
> - m1->vsync_end == m2->vsync_end &&
> - m1->vtotal == m2->vtotal);
> - return bres;
> + if (drm_mode_equal_no_clocks(def, alt)) {
> + int clock;
> +
> + if (!drm_mode_equal_no_clocks(req, def))
> + return def;
> +
> + clock = def->clock / 2 + alt->clock / 2;
> +
> + return req->clock > clock ? def : alt;
> + } else
> + return drm_mode_equal_no_clocks(req, alt) ? alt : def;
Seems a bit convoluted to me.
return user_mode->vrefresh > alt_mode->vrefresh ?
fixed_mode : alt_mode;
maybe?
Though we don't seem to try very hard to make vrefresh accurate so not
100% this is going to work perfectly.
I guess we could go with the "pick the closest" vrefresh approach
instead. I'm thinking we should actually be rejecting the user mode
entirely if it isn't closeto either refresh rate.
> }
>
> bool
> @@ -1734,12 +1738,11 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> pipe_config->has_audio = intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_ON;
>
> if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode) {
> - struct drm_display_mode *panel_mode =
> - intel_connector->panel.alt_fixed_mode;
> - struct drm_display_mode *req_mode = &pipe_config->base.mode;
> + const struct drm_display_mode *panel_mode;
>
> - if (!intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(req_mode, panel_mode))
> - panel_mode = intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode;
> + panel_mode = intel_edp_choose_mode(&pipe_config->base.mode,
> + intel_connector->panel.fixed_mode,
> + intel_connector->panel.alt_fixed_mode);
>
> drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(panel_mode);
>
> --
> 2.16.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
