Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_ctx_freq to exercise requesting freq on a ctx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 08/03/18 09:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
Exercise some new API that allows applications to request that
individual contexts are executed within a desired frequency range.

v2: Split single/continuous set_freq subtests

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paneri, Praveen <praveen.paneri@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kamble, Sagar A <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/Makefile.am      |   1 +
  tests/Makefile.sources |   1 +
  tests/gem_ctx_freq.c   | 604 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/meson.build      |   1 +
  4 files changed, 607 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tests/gem_ctx_freq.c


+static void single(int fd, const struct intel_execution_engine *e)
+{
+	const unsigned int engine = e->exec_id | e->flags;
+	uint32_t ctx = gem_context_create(fd);
+	uint32_t min, max;
+	double measured;
+	igt_spin_t *spin;
+	int pmu;
+
+	get_freq(fd, ctx, &min, &max);
+	igt_info("Min freq: %dMHz; Max freq: %dMHz\n", min, max);
+
+	pmu = perf_i915_open(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY);
+	igt_require(pmu >= 0);
+
+	for (uint32_t freq = min + 50; freq <= max; freq += 100) {

Although it is done in the smoke test, it would be interesting if freq's values were a bit randomized.

+		uint32_t cur, discard;
+
+		set_freq(fd, ctx, freq, freq);
+		get_freq(fd, ctx, &cur, &discard);

igt_assert_eq(freq, cur)?

+
+		gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
+		spin = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx, engine, 0);
+		usleep(10000);

I guess here we wait for the frequency changes to take effect, maybe a small comment would help.

+
+		measured = measure_frequency(pmu, SAMPLE_PERIOD);
+		igt_debugfs_dump(fd, "i915_rps_boost_info");
+
+		igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin);
+		igt_info("%s(single): Measured %.1fMHz, expected %dMhz\n",
+			 e->name, measured, cur);
+		igt_assert(measured > cur - 100 && measured < cur + 100);
+	}
+	gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
+
+	close(pmu);
+	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx);
+}
+

+
+static void sandwich(int fd)
+{
+	uint32_t ctx = gem_context_create(fd);
+	unsigned int engine;
+	uint32_t min, max;
+	igt_spin_t *spin;
+	int pmu;
+
+	pmu = perf_i915_open(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY);
+	igt_require(pmu >= 0);
+
+	spin = igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx, 0, 0);
+	get_freq(fd, ctx, &min, &max);
+	set_freq(fd, ctx, min, min);
+	for_each_physical_engine(fd, engine) {
+		struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
+			.handle = spin->handle,
+		};
+		struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
+			.buffer_count = 1,
+			.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
+			.flags = engine,
+			.rsvd1 = ctx,
+		};
+		uint32_t cur, discard;
+		double measured;
+
+		min += 50;
+		if (min > max)
+			break;
+
+		set_freq(fd, ctx, min, min);
+		get_freq(fd, ctx, &cur, &discard);
+
+		gem_execbuf(fd, &eb);
+		usleep(10000);
+
+		measured = measure_frequency(pmu, SAMPLE_PERIOD);
+		igt_debugfs_dump(fd, "i915_rps_boost_info");
+
+		igt_info("Measured %.1fMHz, expected %dMhz\n", measured, cur);
+		igt_assert(measured > cur - 100 && measured < cur + 100);

Does the frequency change after each execbuf?

+	}
+	igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin);
+	gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
+
+	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx);
+	close(pmu);
+}
+
+static void pwm(int fd, unsigned int *engines, unsigned int nengine, int link)
+{
+	uint32_t ctx[nengine];
+
+	fcntl(link, F_SETFL, fcntl(fd, F_GETFL) | O_NONBLOCK);
+
+	for (unsigned int n = 0; n < nengine; n++)
+		ctx[n] = gem_context_create(fd);
+
+	do {
+		igt_spin_t *spin;
+		struct {
+			uint32_t engine;
+			uint32_t min;
+			uint32_t max;
+		} req;
+
+		while (read(link, &req, sizeof(req)) > 0) {
+			if ((req.engine | req.min | req.max) == 0)
+				goto out;
+
+			igt_assert(req.engine < nengine);
+			set_freq(fd, ctx[req.engine], req.min, req.max);
+		}
+
+		/* Create a 20% load using busy spinners */
+		spin = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx[0], engines[0], 0);
+		for (unsigned int n = 1; n < nengine; n++) {
+			struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
+				.handle = spin->handle,
+			};
+			struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
+				.buffer_count = 1,
+				.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
+				.flags = engines[n],
+				.rsvd1 = ctx[n],
+			};
+			gem_execbuf(fd, &eb);
+		}
+		usleep(100);
+		igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+
+		do
+			usleep(10);
+		while (gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle));
+		igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin);
+		usleep(400);
+	} while (1);
+
+out:
+	for (unsigned int n = 0; n < nengine; n++)
+		gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[n]);
+}
+
+static void smoketest(int fd, int timeout)
+{
+	unsigned int engines[16];

use a macro instead of magic number 16.

+	unsigned int nengine;
+	unsigned int engine;
+	uint32_t min[16], max[16];
+	int pmu, link[2];
+
+	get_freq(fd, 0, &min[0], &max[0]);
+
+	nengine = 0;
+	for_each_physical_engine(fd, engine) {
+		if (nengine == ARRAY_SIZE(engines) - 1)
+			break;
+
+		min[nengine] = min[0];
+		max[nengine] = max[0];
+		engines[nengine] = engine;
+		nengine++;
+	}
+	igt_require(nengine);
+
+	igt_assert(pipe(link) == 0);
+	igt_fork(child, 1)
+		pwm(fd, engines, nengine, link[0]);
+	close(link[0]);
+
+	pmu = perf_i915_open(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY);
+	igt_require(pmu >= 0);
+
+	igt_until_timeout(timeout) {
+		struct {
+			uint32_t engine;
+			uint32_t min;
+			uint32_t max;
+		} req;
+		double measured;
+		uint32_t ctx;
+
+		req.engine = rand() % nengine;
+
+		ctx = gem_context_create(fd);
+		get_freq(fd, ctx, &req.min, &req.max);
+		req.min = rand() % (req.max - req.min) + req.min;
+		req.max = rand() % (req.max - req.min) + req.min;
+		set_freq(fd, ctx, req.min, req.max);
+		get_freq(fd, ctx, &req.min, &req.max);
+
+		igt_debug("Replacing (%d, %d) on engine %x with (%d, %d)\n",
+			  min[req.engine], max[req.engine], req.engine,
+			  req.min, req.max);
+		igt_assert(write(link[1], &req, sizeof(req)) == sizeof(req));
+		gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx);
+
+		min[req.engine] = req.min;
+		max[req.engine] = req.max;
+
+		for (unsigned int n = 0; n < nengine; n++) {
+			igt_debug("[%d]: [%d, %d]\n", n, min[n], max[n]);
+			if (min[n] < req.min)
+				req.min = min[n];
+			if (max[n] > req.max)
+				req.max = max[n];
+		}
+		igt_assert(req.max >= req.min);
+
+		usleep(50000);
+		measured = measure_frequency(pmu, SAMPLE_PERIOD);
+
+		if (measured <= req.min - 100 || measured >= req.max + 100)
+			igt_debugfs_dump(fd, "i915_rps_boost_info");
+		igt_info("Measured %.1fMHz, expected [%d, %d]Mhz\n",
+			 measured, req.min, req.max);
+		igt_assert(measured > req.min - 100 &&
+			   measured < req.max + 100);
+	}
+
+	do {
+		struct {
+			uint32_t engine;
+			uint32_t min;
+			uint32_t max;
+		} req = {};
+
+		write(link[1], &req, sizeof(req));
+		close(link[1]);
+	} while (0);
+	igt_waitchildren();
+	gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
+
+	close(pmu);
+}
+
+static void invalid_param(int fd)
+{

gem_ctx_param is going to be upset again pretty soon ;).

+	uint32_t min, max;
+	uint32_t cur_min, cur_max;
+
+	get_freq(fd, 0, &min, &max);
+
+	igt_assert_eq(__set_freq(fd, 0, min - 50, max), -EINVAL);
+	igt_assert_eq(__set_freq(fd, 0, min, max + 50), -EINVAL);

One more case is both are out of boundary.

igt_assert_eq(__set_freq(fd, 0, min - 50, max + 50), -EINVAL);

+	igt_assert_eq(__set_freq(fd, 0, min + 50, min), -EINVAL);
+	igt_assert_eq(__set_freq(fd, 0, max, max - 50), -EINVAL);
+
+	get_freq(fd, 0, &cur_min, &cur_max);
+	igt_assert_eq(cur_min, min);
+	igt_assert_eq(cur_max, max);

Check frequency didn't change after each ioctl.

Thanks,
Antonio
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux