Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle pipe CRC around enabling/disabling pipe.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Op 08-03-18 om 16:22 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:02:02PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> This will get rid of the following error:
>> [   74.730271] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c:614 drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x13e/0x2f0
>> [   74.730311] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic i915 x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp snd_hda_intel crct10dif_pclmul snd_hda_codec crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep broadcom ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_core bcm_phy_lib snd_pcm tg3 lpc_ich mei_me mei prime_numbers
>> [   74.730353] CPU: 4 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Tainted: G     U           4.16.0-rc2-CI-CI_DRM_3822+ #1
>> [   74.730355] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 8300  /0Y2MRG, BIOS A06 10/17/2011
>> [   74.730359] RIP: 0010:drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x13e/0x2f0
>> [   74.730361] RSP: 0018:ffff88022fb03d10 EFLAGS: 00010086
>> [   74.730365] RAX: ffffffffa0291d20 RBX: ffff88021a180000 RCX: 0000000000000001
>> [   74.730367] RDX: ffffffff820e7db8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff82068cea
>> [   74.730369] RBP: ffff88022fb03d70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff815d26d0
>> [   74.730371] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffffa0161ca0 R12: 0000000000000001
>> [   74.730373] R13: ffff880212448008 R14: ffff880212448330 R15: 0000000000000000
>> [   74.730376] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88022fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [   74.730378] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [   74.730380] CR2: 000055edcbec9000 CR3: 0000000002210001 CR4: 00000000000606e0
>> [   74.730382] Call Trace:
>> [   74.730385]  <IRQ>
>> [   74.730397]  drm_get_last_vbltimestamp+0x36/0x50
>> [   74.730401]  drm_update_vblank_count+0x64/0x240
>> [   74.730409]  drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count+0x41/0x90
>> [   74.730453]  display_pipe_crc_irq_handler+0x176/0x220 [i915]
>> [   74.730497]  i9xx_pipe_crc_irq_handler+0xfe/0x150 [i915]
>> [   74.730537]  ironlake_irq_handler+0x618/0xa30 [i915]
>> [   74.730548]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0x340
>> [   74.730556]  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x1b/0x50
>> [   74.730561]  handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50
>> [   74.730566]  handle_edge_irq+0xe4/0x1b0
>> [   74.730572]  handle_irq+0x11/0x20
>> [   74.730576]  do_IRQ+0x5e/0x120
>> [   74.730584]  common_interrupt+0x84/0x84
>> [   74.730586]  </IRQ>
>> [   74.730591] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xaa/0x350
>> [   74.730593] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008beb8 EFLAGS: 00000212 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffde
>> [   74.730597] RAX: ffff880226b80040 RBX: 000000000031fc3e RCX: 0000000000000001
>> [   74.730599] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8210fb59 RDI: ffffffff820c02e7
>> [   74.730601] RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00000000000040af R09: 0000000000000018
>> [   74.730603] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000004
>> [   74.730606] R13: ffffe8ffffd00430 R14: 0000001166120bf4 R15: ffffffff82294460
>> [   74.730621]  ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xa6/0x350
>> [   74.730629]  do_idle+0x188/0x1d0
>> [   74.730636]  cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
>> [   74.730641]  start_secondary+0x129/0x160
>> [   74.730646]  secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
>> [   74.730660] Code: e1 48 c7 c2 b8 7d 0e 82 be 01 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 ea 8c 06 82 e8 64 ec ff ff 48 8b 83 c8 07 00 00 48 83 78 28 00 0f 84 e2 fe ff ff <0f> 0b 45 31 ed e9 db fe ff ff 41 b8 d3 4d 62 10 89 c8 6a 03 41
>> [   74.730754] ---[ end trace 14b1345705b68565 ]---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Don't try to apply CRC workaround when enabling pipe, it should already be enabled.
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Make crc functions for !DEBUGFS case inline.
>> - Pass intel_crtc to crc functions.
>> - Add comments to callsites.
>> Changes since v3:
>> - Cache selected source to pipe_crc->source.
>> - Set pipe_crc->skipped to MIN_INT during disable to close a race condition.
>> Changes since v4:
>> - Handle fallout from setting pipe_crc->source in irq handler.
>>
>> Cc: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105185
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c       |  4 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c  | 10 +++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h      |  9 ++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index ce16003ef048..7807488084fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  	int head, tail;
>>  
>>  	spin_lock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>> -	if (pipe_crc->source) {
>> +	if (pipe_crc->source && !crtc->base.crc.opened) {
> Hmm. This is starting to get confusing. Seeing as we now lose the
> capability to get all the crcs across the modeset anyway I think I'll
> have to revoke my objection to nuking the old interface. Consider
> that old nugget acked.
Ok thanks. :)
>>  		if (!pipe_crc->entries) {
>>  			spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("spurious interrupt\n");
>> @@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  		 * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
>>  		 * don't trust that one either.
>>  		 */
>> -		if (pipe_crc->skipped == 0 ||
>> +		if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
>>  		    (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
>>  			pipe_crc->skipped++;
>>  			spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 331084082545..2933ad38094f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -12147,6 +12147,9 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>  	if (modeset) {
>>  		update_scanline_offset(intel_crtc);
>>  		dev_priv->display.crtc_enable(pipe_config, state);
>> +
>> +		/* vblanks work again, re-enable pipe CRC. */
>> +		intel_crtc_enable_pipe_crc(intel_crtc);
>>  	} else {
>>  		intel_pre_plane_update(to_intel_crtc_state(old_crtc_state),
>>  				       pipe_config);
>> @@ -12327,6 +12330,13 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>>  
>>  		if (old_crtc_state->active) {
>>  			intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, old_crtc_state->plane_mask);
>> +
>> +			/*
>> +			 * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
>> +			 * or we race against vblank off.
>> +			 */
>> +			intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(intel_crtc);
>> +
>>  			dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(to_intel_crtc_state(old_crtc_state), state);
>>  			intel_crtc->active = false;
>>  			intel_fbc_disable(intel_crtc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index d4368589b355..fce5d3072d97 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -2138,8 +2138,17 @@ int intel_pipe_crc_create(struct drm_minor *minor);
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>>  int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
>>  			      size_t *values_cnt);
>> +void intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> +void intel_crtc_enable_pipe_crc(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>>  #else
>>  #define intel_crtc_set_crc_source NULL
>> +static inline void intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void intel_crtc_enable_pipe_crc(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> +{
>> +}
>>  #endif
>>  extern const struct file_operations i915_display_crc_ctl_fops;
>>  #endif /* __INTEL_DRV_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
>> index 1f5cd572a7ff..4f367c16e9e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c
>> @@ -569,7 +569,8 @@ static void hsw_pipe_A_crc_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  static int ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  				enum pipe pipe,
>>  				enum intel_pipe_crc_source *source,
>> -				uint32_t *val)
>> +				uint32_t *val,
>> +				bool set_wa)
>>  {
>>  	if (*source == INTEL_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_AUTO)
>>  		*source = INTEL_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_PF;
>> @@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ static int ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  		*val = PIPE_CRC_ENABLE | PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_SPRITE_IVB;
>>  		break;
>>  	case INTEL_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_PF:
>> -		if ((IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) ||
>> +		if (set_wa && (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) ||
>>  		     IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) && pipe == PIPE_A)
>>  			hsw_pipe_A_crc_wa(dev_priv, true);
>>  
>> @@ -600,7 +601,8 @@ static int ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  
>>  static int get_new_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  			       enum pipe pipe,
>> -			       enum intel_pipe_crc_source *source, u32 *val)
>> +			       enum intel_pipe_crc_source *source, u32 *val,
>> +			       bool set_wa)
>>  {
>>  	if (IS_GEN2(dev_priv))
>>  		return i8xx_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(source, val);
>> @@ -611,7 +613,7 @@ static int get_new_crc_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  	else if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv) || IS_GEN6(dev_priv))
>>  		return ilk_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(source, val);
>>  	else
>> -		return ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val);
>> +		return ivb_pipe_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, source, val, set_wa);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int pipe_crc_set_source(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> @@ -636,7 +638,7 @@ static int pipe_crc_set_source(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  		return -EIO;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	ret = get_new_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, &source, &val);
>> +	ret = get_new_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, pipe, &source, &val, true);
>>  	if (ret != 0)
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>> @@ -916,7 +918,7 @@ int intel_pipe_crc_create(struct drm_minor *minor)
>>  int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
>>  			      size_t *values_cnt)
>>  {
>> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
>>  	struct intel_pipe_crc *pipe_crc = &dev_priv->pipe_crc[crtc->index];
>>  	enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
>>  	enum intel_pipe_crc_source source;
>> @@ -934,10 +936,11 @@ int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
>>  		return -EIO;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	ret = get_new_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, crtc->index, &source, &val);
>> +	ret = get_new_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, crtc->index, &source, &val, true);
>>  	if (ret != 0)
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>> +	pipe_crc->source = source;
>>  	I915_WRITE(PIPE_CRC_CTL(crtc->index), val);
>>  	POSTING_READ(PIPE_CRC_CTL(crtc->index));
>>  
>> @@ -959,3 +962,39 @@ int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
>>  
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> +
>> +void intel_crtc_enable_pipe_crc(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc = &intel_crtc->base;
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
>> +	struct intel_pipe_crc *pipe_crc = &dev_priv->pipe_crc[crtc->index];
>> +	u32 val = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (!crtc->crc.opened)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (get_new_crc_ctl_reg(dev_priv, crtc->index, &pipe_crc->source, &val, false) < 0)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Don't need pipe_crc->lock here, IRQs are not generated. */
>> +	pipe_crc->skipped = 0;
>> +
>> +	I915_WRITE(PIPE_CRC_CTL(crtc->index), val);
>> +	POSTING_READ(PIPE_CRC_CTL(crtc->index));
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc = &intel_crtc->base;
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
>> +	struct intel_pipe_crc *pipe_crc = &dev_priv->pipe_crc[crtc->index];
>> +
>> +	/* Swallow crc's until we stop generating them. */
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&pipe_crc->lock);
>> +	pipe_crc->skipped = INT_MIN;
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&pipe_crc->lock);
> Does this mean the hw can still generate a crc interrupt after the
> PIPE_CRC_CTL has been cleared?
I think at most just 1, but if modeset disable is fast enough we could theoretically hit it after vblank off probably.
Hence the extra paranoia of setting skipped before synchronize_irq, at that point we know for sure that any
CRC will be swallowed after disable_pipe_crc returns, even on a crazy -rt kernel.

~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux