Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2018-03-05 22:21:21) > some of the static functions used from capture() have the "i915_" > prefix while other don't; most of them take i915 as a parameter, but one > of them derives it internally from error->i915. Let's be consistent by > avoiding prefix for static functions and by getting i915 from > error->i915. While at it, s/dev_priv/i915 in functions that don't > perform register reads. > > v2: take i915 from error->i915 (Michal), s/dev_priv/i915, > update commit message > > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
