Re: [PATCH v14 6/6] drm/i915: expose rcs topology through query uAPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-02-22 19:53:59)
> With the introduction of asymmetric slices in CNL, we cannot rely on
> the previous SUBSLICE_MASK getparam to tell userspace what subslices
> are available. Here we introduce a more detailed way of querying the
> Gen's GPU topology that doesn't aggregate numbers.
> 
> This is essential for monitoring parts of the GPU with the OA unit,
> because counters need to be normalized to the number of
> EUs/subslices/slices. The current aggregated numbers like EU_TOTAL do
> not gives us sufficient information.
> 
> As a bonus we can draw representations of the GPU :
> 
>         https://imgur.com/a/vuqpa
> 
> v2: Rename uapi struct s/_mask/_info/ (Tvrtko)
>     Report max_slice/subslice/eus_per_subslice rather than strides (Tvrtko)
>     Add uapi macros to read data from *_info structs (Tvrtko)
> 
> v3: Use !!(v & DRM_I915_BIT()) for uapi macros instead of custom shifts (Tvrtko)
> 
> v4: factorize query item writting (Tvrtko)
>     tweak uapi struct/define names (Tvrtko)
> 
> v5: Replace ALIGN() macro (Chris)
> 
> v6: Updated uapi comments (Tvrtko)
>     Moved flags != 0 checks into vfuncs (Tvrtko)
> 
> v7: Use access_ok() before copying anything, to avoid overflows (Chris)
>     Switch BUG_ON() to GEM_WARN_ON() (Tvrtko)
> 
> v8: Tweak uapi comments style to match the coding style (Lionel)
> 
> v9: Fix error in comment about computation of enabled subslice (Tvrtko)
> 
> v10: Fix/update comments in uAPI (Sagar)
> 
> v11: Drop drm_i915_query_(slice|subslice|eu)_info in favor of a single
>      drm_i915_query_topology_info (Joonas)
> 
> v12: Add subslice_stride/eu_stride in drm_i915_query_topology_info (Joonas)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<SNIP>

> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c
> @@ -7,8 +7,90 @@
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
>  #include <uapi/drm/i915_drm.h>
>  
> +static int query_topology_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +                              struct drm_i915_query_item *query_item)
> +{
> +       const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu;
> +       struct drm_i915_query_topology_info topo_info;

Just like sseu is just sseu, topo_info could be topo...

Same goes for query, there's really no confusion within a function.

> +       u32 slice_length, subslice_length, eu_length, total_length;
> +
> +       if (query_item->flags != 0)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (sseu->max_slices == 0)
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If we ever change the internal slice mask data type, we'll need to
> +        * update this function.
> +        */

That's pretty self evident from next line, so comment can be thrown away.

> +       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u8) != sizeof(sseu->slice_mask));

<SNIP>

> +/*
> + * Data written by the kernel with query DRM_I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO :
> + *
> + * data: contains the 3 pieces of information :
> + *
> + * - the slice mask with one bit per slice telling whether a slice is
> + *   available. The availability of slice X can be queried with the following
> + *   formula :
> + *
> + *           (data[X / 8] >> (X % 8)) & 1
> + *
> + * - the subslice mask for each slice with one bit per subslice telling
> + *   whether a subslice is available. The availability of subslice Y in slice
> + *   X can be queried with the following formula :
> + *
> + *           (data[subslice_offset +
> + *                 X * subslice_stride +
> + *                 Y / 8] >> (Y % 8)) & 1
> + *
> + * - the EU mask for each subslice in each slice with one bit per EU telling
> + *   whether an EU is available. The availability of EU Z in subslice Y in
> + *   slice X can be queried with the following formula :
> + *
> + *           (data[eu_offset +
> + *                 (X * max_subslices Y) * eu_stride +

s/Y/+ Y/

> + *                 Z / 8] >> (Z % 8)) & 1
> + */
> +struct drm_i915_query_topology_info {
> +       /*
> +        * Unused for now.

+ "Must be cleared to zero."

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux