On 28.02.2018 21:44, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:01:16PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> Add PWM mode to pwm_config() function. The drivers which uses pwm_config() >> were adapted to this change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 11 +++++++++-- >> drivers/bus/ts-nbus.c | 2 +- >> drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 2 +- >> drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c | 2 +- >> drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c | 6 +++++- >> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 5 ++++- >> drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c | 5 ++++- >> drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c | 5 ++++- >> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 4 +++- >> drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 4 +++- >> drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c | 5 ++++- >> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 11 +++++++++-- >> drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 3 ++- >> include/linux/pwm.h | 6 ++++-- >> 16 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > I don't think it makes sense to leak mode support into the legacy API. > The pwm_config() function is considered legacy I missed this aspect. and should eventually go > away. As such it doesn't make sense to integrate a new feature such as > PWM modes into it. Agree. All users of pwm_config() assume normal mode, and > that's what pwm_config() should provide. Agree. > > Anyone that needs something other than normal mode should use the new > atomic PWM API. Agree. > > Thierry > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
