Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm: Verify gamma/degamma LUT size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Regards

Shashank


On 3/1/2018 6:54 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:43:21PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Regards

Shashank


On 2/24/2018 12:55 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

While we want to potentially support multiple different gamma/degamma
LUT sizes we can (and should) at least check that the blob length
is a multiple of the LUT entry size.
I dint understand the exact idea behind doing this, how is this going to
benefit ? May be a bit more description ?
The benefit is rejecting garbage fed in from userspace.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 15 +++++++++++----
   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
index 8945357212ba..933edec0299d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id(struct drm_device *dev,
   					 struct drm_property_blob **blob,
   					 uint64_t blob_id,
   					 ssize_t expected_size,
+					 ssize_t expected_size_mod,
   					 bool *replaced)
   {
   	struct drm_property_blob *new_blob = NULL;
@@ -422,7 +423,13 @@ drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id(struct drm_device *dev,
   		if (new_blob == NULL)
   			return -EINVAL;
- if (expected_size > 0 && expected_size != new_blob->length) {
+		if (expected_size > 0 &&
+		    new_blob->length != expected_size) {
+			drm_property_blob_put(new_blob);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
One line needed here, matching the previous if() pattern
What line? Don't understand.
I mean, I can see a blank line before previous if() condition, so lets keep the same pattern for this if() too

- Shashank
+		if (expected_size_mod > 0 &&
+		    new_blob->length % expected_size_mod != 0) {
   			drm_property_blob_put(new_blob);
   			return -EINVAL;
   		}
@@ -470,7 +477,7 @@ int drm_atomic_crtc_set_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
   		ret = drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id(dev,
   					&state->degamma_lut,
   					val,
-					-1,
+					-1, sizeof(struct drm_color_lut),
   					&replaced);
   		state->color_mgmt_changed |= replaced;
   		return ret;
@@ -478,7 +485,7 @@ int drm_atomic_crtc_set_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
   		ret = drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id(dev,
   					&state->ctm,
   					val,
-					sizeof(struct drm_color_ctm),
+					sizeof(struct drm_color_ctm), -1,
   					&replaced);
   		state->color_mgmt_changed |= replaced;
   		return ret;
@@ -486,7 +493,7 @@ int drm_atomic_crtc_set_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
   		ret = drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id(dev,
   					&state->gamma_lut,
   					val,
-					-1,
+					-1, sizeof(struct drm_color_lut),
   					&replaced);
   		state->color_mgmt_changed |= replaced;
   		return ret;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux