On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 02:01:35 +0100, Jackie Li <yaodong.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.
This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and
updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the
future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.
v8:
- Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h
(Sagar)
- Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)
v9:
- Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)
v10:
- Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse
variable
to avoid potential issues (Joonas)
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (v9)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
