On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 15:08 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:24:35PM -0800, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 15:26 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > WA 0884:bxt:all,cnl:*:A - "When FBC is enabled with eDP PSR, > > > the CPU host modify writes may not get updated on the Display > > > as expected. > > > WA: Write 0x00000000 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A with every CPU > > > host modify write to trigger PSR exit." > > > > > > We can also find on spec other cases where they describe > > > bogus writes to cursor registers to force PSR exit with > > > HW tracking. And it was confirmed by HW engineers that > > > this Wa can be safely applied for any frontbuffer activity. > > > > > > > So the idea is to do a dummy MMIO write to trigger PSR exit. > > yeap. But not good for PSR2 though :( > We would need something else... > We have to figure out HW frontbuffer tracking for PSR2 and I have been mostly refraining from thinking about PSR2 problems until now. If this helps PSR1, let's go with it. > any idea? > > So I will hold the v2 for now... > > > > > > So let's use this more and more here instead of forcibly > > > disable and re-enable PSR everytime that we have a simple > > > reliable flush case. > > > > > > Other commits improve the fbcon/fbdev use a lot, but this > > > approach is the only when where we can get a fully reliable > > > console with no slowness or missed frames and PSR still > > > enabled and active. > > > > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > index f6afa5e5e7c1..ac09d17cd835 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > @@ -6007,6 +6007,9 @@ enum { > > > #define IVB_CURSOR_B_OFFSET 0x71080 > > > #define IVB_CURSOR_C_OFFSET 0x72080 > > > > > > +#define _CUR_SURLIVE 0x700AC > > > +#define CUR_SURLIVE(pipe) _CURSOR2(pipe, _CUR_SURLIVE) > > > > Register address is correct. > > This is a *status* register that provides current surface base address. > > We aren't reading this register anywhere, so writing to it should be > > fine. > > > > > + > > > /* Display A control */ > > > #define _DSPACNTR 0x70180 > > > #define DISPLAY_PLANE_ENABLE (1<<31) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > index 13409c6301e8..49554036ffb8 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > @@ -946,8 +946,19 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits &= ~frontbuffer_bits; > > > > > > /* By definition flush = invalidate + flush */ > > > - if (frontbuffer_bits) > > > - intel_psr_exit(dev_priv); > > > + if (frontbuffer_bits) { > > > + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) { > > > + intel_psr_exit(dev_priv); > > > + } else { > > > + /* > > > + * Display WA #0884: all > > > + * This documented WA for bxt can be safely applied > > > + * broadly so we can force HW tracking to exit PSR > > > + * instead of disabling and re-enabling. > > > + */ > > > + I915_WRITE(CUR_SURLIVE(pipe), 0); > > > > The workaround asks 0 to be written to CUR_SURFLIVE_A. But I think > > writing to the active pipe register makes sense.Can you add that to the > > comment since the patch deviates from the workaround? > > yeap, worth a comment... > > > > > > > > + } > > > + } > > > > > > if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) { > > > if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) > > > > > > There is a psr_activate that follows, you should remove that too. HW > > should be able to activate PSR by itself. > > agreed > > > > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx