This underrun work can be useful to disable more pm function that can cause trouble on underrun situations, like SAGV. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 7 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 38 +--------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 4c5174ceab96..1650dd5e5ffb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ struct intel_fbc { bool active; bool underrun_detected; - struct work_struct underrun_work; /* * Due to the atomic rules we can't access some structures without the @@ -2133,6 +2132,12 @@ struct drm_i915_private { } sagv; struct { + struct work_struct work; + spinlock_t lock; + bool detected; + } underrun; + + struct { /* * Raw watermark latency values: * in 0.1us units for WM0, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 0a7ed990a8d1..ee9bd2d4ce34 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -4045,6 +4045,8 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) intel_hpd_init_work(dev_priv); + intel_underrun_init_work(dev_priv); + INIT_WORK(&rps->work, gen6_pm_rps_work); INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->l3_parity.error_work, ivybridge_parity_work); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 2260aa1ecd8c..3ca27cc8700d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1317,6 +1317,7 @@ void intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pch_transcoder); void intel_check_cpu_fifo_underruns(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +void intel_underrun_init_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); /* i915_irq.c */ void gen5_enable_gt_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t mask); @@ -1766,7 +1767,7 @@ void intel_fbc_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, void intel_fbc_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, unsigned int frontbuffer_bits, enum fb_op_origin origin); void intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); -void intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +void intel_fbc_underrun_detected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); /* intel_hdmi.c */ void intel_hdmi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t hdmi_reg, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c index 38b036c499d9..c63568564b77 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c @@ -1231,10 +1231,8 @@ void intel_fbc_global_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) cancel_work_sync(&fbc->work.work); } -static void intel_fbc_underrun_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) +void intel_fbc_underrun_detected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = - container_of(work, struct drm_i915_private, fbc.underrun_work); struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc; mutex_lock(&fbc->lock); @@ -1252,39 +1250,6 @@ static void intel_fbc_underrun_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) } /** - * intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun_irq - disable FBC when we get a FIFO underrun - * @dev_priv: i915 device instance - * - * Without FBC, most underruns are harmless and don't really cause too many - * problems, except for an annoying message on dmesg. With FBC, underruns can - * become black screens or even worse, especially when paired with bad - * watermarks. So in order for us to be on the safe side, completely disable FBC - * in case we ever detect a FIFO underrun on any pipe. An underrun on any pipe - * already suggests that watermarks may be bad, so try to be as safe as - * possible. - * - * This function is called from the IRQ handler. - */ -void intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) -{ - struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc; - - if (!fbc_supported(dev_priv)) - return; - - /* There's no guarantee that underrun_detected won't be set to true - * right after this check and before the work is scheduled, but that's - * not a problem since we'll check it again under the work function - * while FBC is locked. This check here is just to prevent us from - * unnecessarily scheduling the work, and it relies on the fact that we - * never switch underrun_detect back to false after it's true. */ - if (READ_ONCE(fbc->underrun_detected)) - return; - - schedule_work(&fbc->underrun_work); -} - -/** * intel_fbc_init_pipe_state - initialize FBC's CRTC visibility tracking * @dev_priv: i915 device instance * @@ -1352,7 +1317,6 @@ void intel_fbc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc; INIT_WORK(&fbc->work.work, intel_fbc_work_fn); - INIT_WORK(&fbc->underrun_work, intel_fbc_underrun_work_fn); mutex_init(&fbc->lock); fbc->enabled = false; fbc->active = false; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c index 77c123cc8817..6a290621177b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c @@ -350,6 +350,55 @@ bool intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, return old; } +static void intel_underrun_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = + container_of(work, struct drm_i915_private, underrun.work); + + intel_fbc_underrun_detected(dev_priv); +} + +/* + * intel_handle_fifo_underrun_irq - disable FBC when we get a FIFO underrun + * + * Without FBC, most underruns are harmless and don't really cause too many + * problems, except for an annoying message on dmesg. With FBC, underruns can + * become black screens or even worse, especially when paired with bad + * watermarks. So in order for us to be on the safe side, completely disable FBC + * in case we ever detect a FIFO underrun on any pipe. An underrun on any pipe + * already suggests that watermarks may be bad, so try to be as safe as + * possible. + * + */ +static void intel_handle_fifo_underrun_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + if (!HAS_FBC(dev_priv)) + return; + + spin_lock(&dev_priv->underrun.lock); + + if (dev_priv->underrun.detected) + goto out; + dev_priv->underrun.detected = true; + + schedule_work(&dev_priv->underrun.work); +out: + spin_unlock(&dev_priv->underrun.lock); +} + +/** + * intel_underrun_init_work - Handle underrun outside atomic context. + * @dev_priv: i915 device instance + * + * Some features needs to be disabled when underrun is detected. + * Let's use work queue to make it outside the atomic irq context. + */ +void intel_underrun_init_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->underrun.work, intel_underrun_work_fn); + spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->underrun.lock); +} + /** * intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle CPU fifo underrun interrupt * @dev_priv: i915 device instance @@ -379,7 +428,7 @@ void intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, pipe_name(pipe)); } - intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun_irq(dev_priv); + intel_handle_fifo_underrun_irq(dev_priv); } /** -- 2.13.6 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx