Re: [PATCH igt] lib/dummyload: Avoid assertions in lowlevel spin constructor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 22/02/18 00:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
__igt_spin_batch_new() may be used inside a background helper which is
competing against the GPU being reset. As such, we cannot even assert
that the spin->handle is busy immediately after submission as it may
have already been reset by another client writing to i915_wedged.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/igt_dummyload.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
  tests/pm_rps.c      |  4 +++-
  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/igt_dummyload.c b/lib/igt_dummyload.c
index 27eb402b..8ecd1dc8 100644
--- a/lib/igt_dummyload.c
+++ b/lib/igt_dummyload.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  #include <time.h>
  #include <signal.h>
  #include <pthread.h>
+#include <sys/poll.h>
#include <i915_drm.h> @@ -205,7 +206,6 @@ ___igt_spin_batch_new(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned engine, uint32_t dep, spin->out_fence = emit_recursive_batch(spin, fd, ctx, engine, dep,
  					       out_fence);
-	igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle));
pthread_mutex_lock(&list_lock);
  	igt_list_add(&spin->link, &spin_list);
@@ -238,9 +238,14 @@ __igt_spin_batch_new(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned engine, uint32_t dep)
  igt_spin_t *
  igt_spin_batch_new(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned engine, uint32_t dep)
  {
+	igt_spin_t *spin;
+
  	igt_require_gem(fd);
- return __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx, engine, dep);
+	spin = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx, engine, dep);
+	igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle));

Should all uses of the low level constructors be changed to this high level one if the test doesn't have the race with i915_wedged?

Thanks,
Antonio

+
+	return spin;
  }
igt_spin_t *
@@ -267,10 +272,16 @@ __igt_spin_batch_new_fence(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned engine)
  igt_spin_t *
  igt_spin_batch_new_fence(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned engine)
  {
+	igt_spin_t *spin;
+
  	igt_require_gem(fd);
  	igt_require(gem_has_exec_fence(fd));
- return __igt_spin_batch_new_fence(fd, ctx, engine);
+	spin = __igt_spin_batch_new_fence(fd, ctx, engine);
+	igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle));
+	igt_assert(poll(&(struct pollfd){spin->out_fence, POLLIN}, 1, 0) == 0);
+
+	return spin;
  }
static void notify(union sigval arg)
diff --git a/tests/pm_rps.c b/tests/pm_rps.c
index f71976ed..006d084b 100644
--- a/tests/pm_rps.c
+++ b/tests/pm_rps.c
@@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static void load_helper_run(enum load load)
  		return;
  	}
+ igt_require_gem(drm_fd);
+
  	lh.exit = false;
  	lh.load = load;
@@ -233,7 +235,7 @@ static void load_helper_run(enum load load) igt_debug("Applying %s load...\n", lh.load ? "high" : "low"); - spin[0] = igt_spin_batch_new(drm_fd, 0, 0, 0);
+		spin[0] = __igt_spin_batch_new(drm_fd, 0, 0, 0);
  		if (lh.load == HIGH)
  			spin[1] = __igt_spin_batch_new(drm_fd, 0, 0, 0);
  		while (!lh.exit) {

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux