Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-02-21 15:21:04)
>> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Include a GEM_TRACE to show when the context is complete and we advance
>> > the ELSP port.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 3 +++
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> > index 9b6d781b22ec..fe5a0fa3f3b6 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> > @@ -890,6 +890,9 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>> > trace_i915_gem_request_out(rq);
>> > i915_gem_request_put(rq);
>> >
>> > + GEM_TRACE("%s completed ctx=%d\n",
>> > + engine->name, port->context_id);
>> > +
>>
>> There is a trace above with a count so info is already there,
>> and could be amended to output completion if count == 1.
>
> But that assumes we don't add a bug in between. :)
>
> What I was thinking was that we really wanted to show the port
> advancement here, but not quite sure what to show. This gives us a clear
> marker for something to search for that doesn't require us to know that
> when count==1 we expect it to complete. Sometimes I like going easy on
> myself.
Agreed on here. It is hard enough to decode interactions
in the logs so being explicit and clear always helps.
-Mika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
