On 22/02/2018 10:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
My bad,
perf_pmu.c: In function ‘accuracy’:
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index b9c4dd58..3bbb18d2 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
- igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
+ igt_info("%u: busy %"PRIu64"us, idle %"PRIu64"us: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
