Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-02-19 11:34:34) > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:57:46AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > >> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as > >> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be > >> reused for other domain numbers. > >> > >> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of > >> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). > >> > >> Extract the domain number from drm_device and pass it into > >> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() function. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I don't know what happened to this, and it didn't make it into > > v4.16-rc1. I applied it to pci/deprecate-get-bus-and-slot for v4.17 > > along with the patch that actually removes pci_get_bus_and_slot(). > > It fell between the cracks as we couldn't apply it before getting a > backmerge on the dependency. Sorry about that. > > Ack for merging through your tree. I just retested the patch and it still passes CI. We also now have the dependency in our tree through the backmerge, so I can send this for the next drm-next pull request. Either way suits me. Regards, Joonas _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
