On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:07:49PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 14-02-18 om 13:37 schreef Patchwork: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: Adding NV12 support (rev10) > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/28103/ > > State : warning > > > > == Summary == > > > > $ dim sparse origin/drm-tip > > Commit: drm/i915/skl+: rename skl_wm_values struct to skl_ddb_values > > Okay! > > > > Commit: drm/i915/skl+: refactor WM calculation for NV12 > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio.c:256:23: warning: memcpy with byte count of 279040 > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio.c:257:23: warning: memcpy with byte count of 279040 > > + ^~ > > + ^~ > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1366:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216 > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1424:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216 > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4656:19: error: no member 'is_nv12' in struct skl_plane_wm > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4656:19: warning: generating address of non-lvalue (8) > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4656:5: error: ‘struct skl_plane_wm’ has no member named ‘is_nv12’ > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4834:15: error: no member 'is_nv12' in struct skl_plane_wm > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4834:15: warning: unknown expression (8 46) > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4834:8: error: ‘const struct skl_plane_wm’ has no member named ‘is_nv12’ > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘skl_compute_wm_levels’: > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘skl_write_plane_wm’: > > + if (wm->is_nv12) { > > +make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2 > > +make[2]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.o] Error 1 > > +make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > +make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > +make: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/] Error 2 > > + wm->is_nv12 = true; > > > > Commit: drm/i915/skl+: add NV12 in skl_format_to_fourcc > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1366:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216 > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1424:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216 > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio.c:256:23: warning: memcpy with byte count of 279040 > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio.c:257:23: warning: memcpy with byte count of 279040 > > > > Commit: drm/i915/skl+: support verification of DDB HW state for NV12 > > -make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > > > Commit: drm/i915/skl+: NV12 related changes for WM > > - ^~ > > - ^~ > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio.c:256:23: warning: memcpy with byte count of 279040 > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio.c:257:23: warning: memcpy with byte count of 279040 > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1366:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216 > > +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1424:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216 > > -O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4687:19: error: no member 'is_nv12' in struct skl_plane_wm > > -O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4687:19: warning: generating address of non-lvalue (8) > > -O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4687:5: error: ‘struct skl_plane_wm’ has no member named ‘is_nv12’ > > -O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4865:15: error: no member 'is_nv12' in struct skl_plane_wm > > -O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4865:15: warning: unknown expression (8 46) > > -O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4865:8: error: ‘const struct skl_plane_wm’ has no member named ‘is_nv12’ > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘skl_compute_wm_levels’: > > -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘skl_write_plane_wm’: > > - if (wm->is_nv12) { > > -make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2 > > -make[2]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.o] Error 1 > > -make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > -make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > > -make: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/] Error 2 > > - wm->is_nv12 = true; > Looks like not all commits compile on their own? > ~Maarten Yep. That is exactly the case. We run sparse build incrementally, i.e. applying one patch after another, building and looking for any difference in what is reported. Patch > Commit: drm/i915/skl+: rename skl_wm_values struct to skl_ddb_values breaks compilation. Please fix that. You can check your series locally with something like: git rebase HEAD~12 --exec make -- Cheers, Arek _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
