|
On 2/14/2018 9:36 AM,
abhijeet.kumar@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Abhijeet Kumar <abhijeet.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> --- sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c index 8c1b07e300a8..377d5719b4cd 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c @@ -2714,7 +2714,7 @@ static unsigned int hda_sync_power_state(struct hda_codec *codec, int count; for (count = 0;count < 500; count++) { - state = snd_hda_codec_read(codec, fg, 0, + state = snd_hdac_codec_read(&codec->core, fg, 0, AC_VERB_GET_POWER_STATE, 0); if (state & AC_PWRST_ERROR){ msleep(20); Both tests are passing on hsw and bdw devices.I can conclude that none of my changes in "ALSA: hda: Make use of core codec functions to sync power state" is "directly" causing the regression. As this patch series changes the previously defined sync function similar to the latest one (the one defined in the defaulter patch). Sidenote- Sorry for the missing commit message, it was just a HACK patch. :) -Abhijeet |
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
